Metrics and Group Structure Reduction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between metrics on manifolds and the reduction of group structures, specifically how a metric tensor induces an orthonormal frame and reduces the structure group from GL(n, ℝ) to O(n). The presence of a symmetric, positive-definite metric tensor allows for the definition of an orthonormal frame, which leads to the conclusion that the global structure group is reduced to O(n). The participants clarify that the metric tensor indeed imposes an inner product structure on tangent spaces, facilitating the preservation of angles and lengths through the orthogonal group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Principal Bundles and their structure
  • Familiarity with Riemannian Geometry and metric tensors
  • Knowledge of Linear Algebra, specifically groups like GL(n, ℝ) and O(n)
  • Concept of Frame Bundles and their relationship to tangent bundles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Riemannian metrics and their implications on manifold structures
  • Learn about the reduction of structure groups in the context of fiber bundles
  • Explore the Gram-Schmidt process and its application in defining orthonormal frames
  • Investigate the role of the orthogonal group in preserving inner products in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and students of differential geometry seeking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between metrics and group structures in manifold theory.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
I don't understand the geometry of what happens when you give a manifold a metric, in particular how the group structure reduces to the orthogonal group.

I've read the wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduction_of_the_structure_group a dozen times but I get stuck when it says that
...the reduction of the structure group is an H-bundle B_Hsuch that the pushout B_H \times_H Gis isomorphic to B...

I understand that the group Gstructure is a requirement for constructing a Principal Bundle because we want to act on the fibres by representatives of some group G. And it is this continuous, free and transitive right action that causes the fibre to be homeomorphic to the group.

However, giving a manifold a metric is equivalent to giving the tangent bundle a map (or a tensor) from TM\times TM \rightarrow \mathbb{R}. The tangent bundle is associated with it's frame bundle (which is where the basis comes from) which is also a torsor, so I understand how the fibre bundle has an intimate relationship with a group. But now I get stuck, because my book says that now the Frames (i.e. fibres of the Frame Bundle) are required to be orthonormal due to the presence of a metric. Why? What has caused the group to reduce from GL(n,\mathbb{R}) to \mathcal{O}?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, because a metric gives you a notion of angles and lengths.

Given a (symmetric, positive-definite) metric tensor ##G##, you can always define an orthonormal frame ##E## via ##E^\top E = G##. The existence of this frame locally reduces the structure group to ##SO(n)##. Stitching various patches together, we can conclude that the global structure group is reduced to ##O(n)##.
 
Hi Ben,

So are you saying that the metric tensor G defined between tangent spaces T_x M makes them inner product spaces (which gives you angles and lengths), and then this somehow picks out an orthonormal frame fibre E? Then, since we have the metric to preserve the inner product (and so we can stitch properly), the group action must also act on the frame bundle in a similar preservative way, and the only subgroup of the GL(n,\mathbb{R}) which accomplishes this is the orthogonal group? So without any loss of information, we can just restrict our attention to the orthogonal group structure?

What if I asked the inverse question? Let E be a tangent bundle on a manifold and associate it with a frame bundle F with group structure GL(n,\mathbb{R}). Suppose I then reduce the group structure to the orthogonal group \mathcal{O}_n, does this explicitly impose a metric on the manifold?
 
Last edited:
Note: By "somehow" I mean Gram-Schmidt.
 
Since ##O(n)## is defined as the group that preserves a positive-definite quadratic form, then yes. The quadratic form can be called the metric tensor.
 
Here is an example that I find helpful.

Suppose one has a Riemannian metric on an oriented 2 dimensional surface. At each point the vectors of length 1 form a circle and SO(2) acts on them by rotation in the positively oriented direction. The circles together with these rotations are a principal SO(2) bundle over the surface.

Here is how to determine the rotations on a unit tangent vector, ##v.## Let ##w ## be the unit vector that is orthogonal to ##v ## such that the frame ##(v,w)## is positively oriented. ##w## is uniquely determined by the metric together with the orientation. You need both.

Then the action is ##e^iθ .v = cos(θ)v + sin(θ)w ##

And the action on ##w## is ##-sin(θ)v + cos(θ)w##

So this action is also an action on the oriented orthonormal frame bundle. In the case of surfaces there is really no difference.

Now start with a linear action of SO(2) on the tangent bundle of the surface and suppose there is a principal SO(2) subbundle. One gets a Riemannian metric by letting the vectors in the fiber circles be the unit vectors and by rotating each vector by 90 degrees to find the vector orthogonal to it in the positively oriented direction.

Note that this simultaneously definines both a metric and an orientation on the surface.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K