Metrizable space with countable dense subset

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of metrizable spaces, specifically focusing on showing that a metrizable space with a countable dense subset has a countable basis. The original poster attempts to construct a basis using open balls centered at points in the dense subset.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the construction of a basis from a countable dense subset and question whether the proposed basis generates the correct topology. There are considerations about the necessity of finding open balls around arbitrary points in the space and ensuring these balls are contained within the proposed basis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of their reasoning. Some have provided insights into the requirements for a basis in the context of metric topology, while others are questioning assumptions about the relationship between points in the dense subset and arbitrary points in the space.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to verify that the constructed basis indeed generates the topology of the space, and participants are navigating the implications of density and open sets in their arguments.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Show that every metrizable space with a countable dense subset has a countable basis.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let A be a countable dense subset of the metric space (X, d). For any x in A, take the countable collection of open balls {B(x, 1/n) : n is a positive integer}. Since A is countable, the family (call it F) of all such open balls is countable. We claim that it is a basis for X.

First of all, F covers X. Since Cl(A) = X, for any x0 in X, there exists a sequence xn of points of A such that xn --> x. So, for any ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that for n >= N, xn is in the open ball B(x0, ε). But now, for any such xn, the open ball B(xn, ε) contains x0, so F indeed covers all of X.

Clearly if x is in the intersection of any two elements of F, there exists another element of F (i.e. some positive integer N) such that B(x, 1/N) is contained in the intersection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All is good. But your not done. You still need to show that your basis generates the correct topology. All you've proven now is that it's a basis. But the topology could be coarser then the one you want...
 
OK, but this seems very obvious, doesn't it? (unless I'm missing something, of course)

In the metric topology, a set is open iff for every x in the set, there exists some open ball B(x, ε) contained in it. Take any integer N such that 1/N < ε. Then the open ball B(x, 1/N) is definitely contained in our open set.

Hence, our collection is a basis "almost" by hypothesis.
 
radou said:
OK, but this seems very obvious, doesn't it? (unless I'm missing something, of course)

In the metric topology, a set is open iff for every x in the set, there exists some open ball B(x, ε) contained in it. Take any integer N such that 1/N < ε. Then the open ball B(x, 1/N) is definitely contained in our open set.

Hence, our collection is a basis "almost" by hypothesis.

It's a little trickier then that... You don't know that x is in A. Thus B(x,1/N) is not necessairily in the basis.
 
Hm, why would x be in A? Haven't I shown that my family covers X? Since I have shown that for any x in X there is some open ball containing it, and by definition, there must be an open ball around x contained in that very open ball, right?
 
Hmm, I'm just saying that if you take an open set G, then for every x in that open set, you need to find a basiselement B such that x\in B\subseteq G. But if you take B=B(x,1/N), then this is not the correct choice since x doesn't have to A. And in that case B doesn't have to lie in our basis. So you'll need to find another candidate for B.

I hope I didnt misunderstood your post...
 
Hm, OK, I think I get it now.

Let U be an open subset of X, and let x be in U. Out family F is a cover for X, so take an element of the form B(x0, 1/n) containing x. Now we need to find an open ball around x itself contained in B(x0, 1/n), but if x is not in A...hmm...OK, I'll think about it some more.
 
You'll need to use density of A again, and probably the triangle inequality...
 
Just a small sub-question. The metric topology for a metric space X consists of all unions of elements of the family {B(x, ε) : x is in X and ε > 0}, right? This is true for any metric space, right?
 
  • #10
Yes, that is true for any metric space!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K