MGF Help / General Integration/Multiplication of e^x help please

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevieg123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E^x General
Stevieg123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I solved this problem a couple months ago, but seem to have forgotten some rules of calculus with regards to e in the meantime. The goal is to just solve this integral. Integral from 0 to +inf of (e^tx) times (5e^-5x) dx

Now - in my work I got the answer of 5/5-t, which is correct.

In the key that I have the answer to, one tip they give is that they use the integration rule of:

Integral from 0 to +inf of e^-at dt = 1/a if a>0.So, I went at it with the standard integration by parts, but quickly realized I had forgotten some rules about multiplying e^ax X e^something else, because I couldn't terminate the integrals to get to the point of reaching 5/5-t.

Just basically did something like:

u= e^tx, dv= 5e^-5x -> du= te^tx, v=: -e^-5x

but I think I forgot a rule somewhere as when I put it into uv - S vdu form I realized I was stuck.

Does anyone know how to solve this? Do I need to do IBP a few times, or can I multiply the e's together to get to the form from before?

-or-

Do I not need to do IBP at all? Is the integral in its original form of Integral from 0 to +inf (e^tx) times (5e^-5x) dx

able to be multiplied out to get to the e^-at form required in the answer? Looking over it now, I'm starting to figure this may be true. But like I said before, I've forgotten some rules with multiplying the two together. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

edit - sorry for the sloppy formatting in some places, I'm unfamiliar with the codes here. I just copied the integral code from someone else's post to make it look sort of nice. The basic integral is (e^tx times 5e^-5x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stevieg123 said:
I solved this problem a couple months ago, but seem to have forgotten some rules of calculus with regards to e in the meantime. The goal is to just solve this integral.


Integral from 0 to +inf of (e^tx) times (5e^-5x) dx

Now - in my work I got the answer of 5/5-t, which is correct.

In the key that I have the answer to, one tip they give is that they use the integration rule of:

Integral from 0 to +inf of e^-at dt = 1/a if a>0.


So, I went at it with the standard integration by parts, but quickly realized I had forgotten some rules about multiplying e^ax X e^something else, because I couldn't terminate the integrals to get to the point of reaching 5/5-t.

Just basically did something like:

u= e^tx, dv= 5e^-5x -> du= te^tx, v=: -e^-5x

but I think I forgot a rule somewhere as when I put it into uv - S vdu form I realized I was stuck.

Does anyone know how to solve this? Do I need to do IBP a few times, or can I multiply the e's together to get to the form from before?

-or-

Do I not need to do IBP at all? Is the integral in its original form of


Integral from 0 to +inf (e^tx) times (5e^-5x) dx

able to be multiplied out to get to the e^-at form required in the answer? Looking over it now, I'm starting to figure this may be true. But like I said before, I've forgotten some rules with multiplying the two together. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

edit - sorry for the sloppy formatting in some places, I'm unfamiliar with the codes here. I just copied the integral code from someone else's post to make it look sort of nice. The basic integral is (e^tx times 5e^-5x).

You're making this much harder than it is--you don't need integration by parts. Your original integral is this (where the limits of integration are 0 and \infty:
\int e^{tx}5e^{-5x}dx
= 5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dx


Here you're integrating something that looks like e^{kx}, so a simple substitution will suffice.
Also, don't forget that this is an improper integral, so you'll need to take a limit when you evaluate the antiderivative.
 
Mark44 said:
You're making this much harder than it is--you don't need integration by parts. Your original integral is this (where the limits of integration are 0 and \infty:
\int e^{tx}5e^{-5x}dx
= 5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dxHere you're integrating something that looks like e^{kx}, so a simple substitution will suffice.
Also, don't forget that this is an improper integral, so you'll need to take a limit when you evaluate the antiderivative.

Thanks, I figured it was something like that. So then my question becomes this. I see how the derivative can easily become this:

5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dx

by factoring the 5 out and combining the two.

But my question then becomes, how can it be represented as (t-5) when the answer in front of me clearly states that the integral becomes:

5\int e^{-(5-t)x} dx which takes on the form of 5\int e^{-at} dt which can then be rewritten as 5/(5-t)? The signs get reversed somewhere in there and it confuses me as to why and how.

Is it just intuition? Am I supposed to look at 5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dx and say to myself, oh, just negate the (t-5) and it becomes easy to represent?
 
Stevieg123 said:
Thanks, I figured it was something like that. So then my question becomes this. I see how the derivative can easily become this:

5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dx

by factoring the 5 out and combining the two.

But my question then becomes, how can it be represented as (t-5) when the answer in front of me clearly states that the integral becomes:

5\int e^{-(5-t)x} dx which takes on the form of 5\int e^{-at} dt which can then be rewritten as 5/(5-t)? The signs get reversed somewhere in there and it confuses me as to why and how.

Is it just intuition? Am I supposed to look at 5\int e^{(t - 5)x} dx and say to myself, oh, just negate the (t-5) and it becomes easy to represent?
No, you should be using integration, not intuition. You're jumping ahead too many steps without actually doing the intervening work. For this problem it seems that knowing the answer ahead of time is an obstacle.

Here are the things you need to do:
  1. Find the antiderivative for the definite integral (limits are 0 and b): 5\int e^{(t-5)x} dx. There's actually a limit involved, namely lim b --> \infty.
  2. Evaluate the antiderivative you found at the two limits of integration. You haven't taken the limit yet.
  3. In the two expressions you get, one of which involves b, take the limit as b --> \infty.
If you do these steps correctly you should get the answer you're looking for.
 
No, you should be using integration, not intuition. You're jumping ahead too many steps without actually doing the intervening work. For this problem it seems that knowing the answer ahead of time is an obstacle.

Here are the things you need to do:
  1. Find the antiderivative for the definite integral (limits are 0 and b): 5\int e^{(t-5)x} dx. There's actually a limit involved, namely lim b --> \infty.
  2. Evaluate the antiderivative you found at the two limits of integration. You haven't taken the limit yet.
  3. In the two expressions you get, one of which involves b, take the limit as b --> \infty.
If you do these steps correctly you should get the answer you're looking for.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top