Michelson interferometer - maxima and minima

Anabelle37
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
URGENT! michelson interferometer - maxima and minima

Homework Statement



If a wave is reflected at a surface of a plate with higher refractive index (eg. At air glass or air-metal) it suffers a λ/2 phase change. Show that for the interferometer, maxima will occur for 2dcosθ = (n+1/2)λ and minima for 2dcosθ = nλ.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



When the path length difference is zero or an integer multiple of the wavelength, the waves arrive at a common point exactly in phase and they interfere fully constructively there. This is seen by the bright fringes, so maxima occur when 2dcosθ = nλ (n=0,1,2...) (1)
But because the wave is reflected at a surface of a plate with higher refractive index, it suffers a λ/2 phase change. So equation (1) becomes 2dcosθ = nλ + λ/2 = (n+1/2)λ (2)

However, when the path length difference is an odd multiple of half the wavelength, the waves arrive at a common point exactly out of phase and they interfere fully destructively there. This is seen by the dark fringes, so minima occur when 2dcosθ = (n+1/2)λ (3)
But because the wave is reflected at a surface of a plate with higher refractive index, it suffers a λ/2 phase change. So equation (3) becomes 2dcosθ = (n+1)λ (4)

Equation 4 is not correct so I don't know if I'm going about it the right way??
PLEASE HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If n ranges over all integers, so does n+1. Your equation is completely equivalent to the formula you were looking to derive.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top