Microcanonical ensemble density matrix

Seban87
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Ref: R.K Pathria Statistical mechanics (third edition sec 5.2A)
First it is argued that the density matrix for microcanonical will be diagonal with all diagonal elements equal in the energy representation. Then it is said that this general form should remain the same in all representations. i.e all the off diagonal elements zero and the diagonal elements all equal to one another.
This is my question. Why should the form necessarily be the same in all representations? To say that all diagonal elements (in any representation) are equal means that the probabilities for measuring all eigenvalues of any operator is the same. We may argue that the probability for measuring any energy eigenvalue within the specified range is the same (based on equal a priori probabilities).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post in the other forums, this is for introductions. Welcome :)
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Please post in the other forums, this is for introductions. Welcome :)
Sorry, Thanks. :) . Came across some great discussions in the forum. Very useful. Looking forward to more.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Hello everyone, I'm Cosmo. I'm an 18 years old student majoring in physics. I found this forum cause I was searching on Google if it's common for physics student to feel like they're in the wrong major in the first semester cause it feels like too much for me to learn the materials even the ones that are considered as "basic math" or "basic physics", I've initial fascination with the universe's mysteries and it disconnect with the reality of intense, foundational mathematics courses required...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
309
Views
14K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top