Comparing Energy Emissions: Microwave Ovens vs. Cell Phones

AI Thread Summary
Microwave ovens emit electromagnetic waves at similar frequencies to cell phones but with significantly higher energy output, around 500 watts compared to 2 watts for cell phones. This difference in power suggests that microwave ovens produce waves with greater amplitude, which relates to the energy density of the waves. The generation methods differ, with microwaves using a magnetron and cell phones using transistors, leading to variations in how energy is emitted. While the energy carried by individual photons is consistent across both devices if frequencies match, the total energy output differs due to the number of photons emitted. Understanding this distinction clarifies the differences in energy emissions between microwave ovens and cell phones.
jslag
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If the EM waves emitted by a cell phone and a microwave oven have similar frequencies, what does it mean that the waves emitted by the oven contain more energy? I believe that a microwave oven generates about 500 watts, whereas a cell phone generates only about 2 watts. What exactly does that mean? Since the wave frequencies are similar, does this mean that the oven produces waves with greater amplitude? I understand that the waves generated by the oven are amplified inside the oven itself, but I'm trying to understand what makes the waves themselves different to begin with.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The method in which they are generated are different. A microwave oven uses something called a magnetron. It is a type of vacuum tube and uses resonant cavities to set up electromagnetic oscillations. A cell phone uses transistors as oscillators and amplifiers to do the same thing much more precisely controlled and at a much lower power level. As you stated in your first post, the oven generates waves with greater amplitude.
 
Huh? What am I missing here? The amount of energy carried by a photon is related to its frequency. The difference between the two items is in the number of photons emitted. Other than that, a photon is a photon and if the frequencies are the same, the energy carried is the same (per photon).
 
interested_learner said:
Huh? What am I missing here? The amount of energy carried by a photon is related to its frequency. The difference between the two items is in the number of photons emitted. Other than that, a photon is a photon and if the frequencies are the same, the energy carried is the same (per photon).
The OP was looking at it from the classical/wave point of view, where the energy density is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the wave. In the quantum picture, your description is correct - the microwave emits more photons per second per unit solid angle than the cellphone.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top