Sketching the [0-1-1] Direction and Its Relationship to {110} and {111} Planes

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSBeckton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on sketching the [0-1-1] direction and identifying its relationship with {110} and {111} planes. Participants express confusion about the second part of the question regarding Miller indices and the concept of parallel planes sharing the same indices. The sketching process is deemed straightforward, involving a Cartesian coordinate system and the definitions of indices. Additionally, there is uncertainty about a third question concerning the indices of <111> directions in the (1̅01) plane of a cubic cell. Overall, the thread highlights a need for clarification on the application of Miller indices in these contexts.
JSBeckton
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
I'm not exactly sure what to do here after I find the direction, can anyone help me out? Thanks:

Sketch the <br /> \left[ {0\overline 1 1} \right]<br /> direction. Which {110} and {111} plane(s) does it lie in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a poorly worded question. I can't remember being asked a question like that with regard to miller indicies. It's pretty obvious to get the direction, but I really don't understand what they are looking for in the second part either. Unless they are eluding to the notion that parallel planes have the same indicies...Maybe a read of this thread may help. Astronuc is the man!

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=92257
 
The sketching part is simple. Draw a cartesian coordinate system and use the definitions of the indices. I can't understand the second question either.
 
I don't understand it either and my test is on monday! (this is a practice test) There is a 3rd part that's kinda confusing too, he did not do any of this stuff in class:

What are the indices of the four directions of the form <111> that lie in the <br /> \left( {\overline 1 01} \right)<br /> plane of a cibic cell?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top