Minimizing action of falling maple seed.

  • Context: Maple 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Maple Seed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a falling maple seed, particularly focusing on the application of the action principle in physics to explain its motion as observed in a slow-motion video. Participants explore the complexities of modeling the seed's interaction with air and the implications of rigid body motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a video of a maple seed falling and questions how the action principle can be applied to explain its motion.
  • Another participant suggests that a Lagrangian treatment for rigid body motion is not commonly seen, proposing that Newtonian mechanics may be simpler for such cases.
  • A participant discusses the interaction of the seed with air, noting that the seed spins due to this interaction and that modeling the air flow around it to apply the action principle would be complex due to the many degrees of freedom in a fluid system.
  • One participant proposes that the twirling motion of the seed minimizes drag and turbulence, comparing it to a paper airplane that glides at an angle to reduce drag.
  • Another participant observes that the seed appears to surge upward and float at the end of the video, suggesting a possible change in its interaction with the air.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the floating effect, stating that they have never witnessed a maple seed stop falling suddenly and speculating that the seed may land on an unseen surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the seed's motion, particularly regarding the floating effect observed in the video. There is no consensus on the explanation of this phenomenon or the applicability of the action principle in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenges of applying the action principle to complex fluid dynamics, as well as the limitations of observational evidence in interpreting the seed's behavior.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
In the following link is a slow motion video of a maple tree seed falling (you have to wait till the 7th second).



From the Wiki article on Action

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics)

"In physics, action is an attribute of the dynamics of a physical system. It is a mathematical functional which takes the trajectory, also called path or history, of the system as its argument and has a real number as its result. Action has the dimension of energy × time, and its unit is joule-seconds in the International System of Units (SI). Generally, the action takes different values for different paths. Classical mechanics postulates that the path actually followed by a physical system is that for which the action is minimized, or, more strictly, is stationary."If we consider the falling seed and the air through which it falls as the dynamical system how can we use the above quote to help explain how the seed falls in the above video?

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't actually seen a Lagrangian treatment for rigid body motion. The Newtonian treatment is much simpler I think when it comes to rigid bodies.
 
The maple tree seed spins because it interacts with the air. The air flows around it in a highly complex, non-static, non-rigid way. If you dropped the seed in a vacuum with no initial spin, it would not spin. To use the action principle, you would have to model all the possible ways (possible mathematically, not necessarily physically) that the air can flow around it - this is the action - then minimize your expression to get the actual physical air flow - this is the least action. It's simple in concept, but would be difficult in practice to use a least action approach quantitatively to solve for fluid flow. If I remember right, the least action approach is useful in practice if there are very few degrees of freedom in the system (a bead on a hoop, a weight on a plane, etc.). For a fluid, each molecule is somewhat free, so your system would have a huge number of degrees of freedom.

If you want to try to conceptualize the least action principle for a twirling maple seed, you could say that its twirling leads to the least amount of drag and least amount of air turbulence, because the air encounters its knife edge when it twirls instead of it's broad face. This similar to a simple paper airplane. If you simply drop a paper airplane, it will not fall straight down, but instead will glide at an angle, in the direction where the drag is minimized.
 
I think what he is pointing to is that the seed falls, then surges upward, then floats or maintains its elevation... as if the seed's airfoil suddenly gets a better grip on the air, speeds up its rotation, then somehow "overspins" to lift the seed...
 
That floating at the very end of the video must be a very subtle effect or be just the camera getting bumped. I have watched a lot of real maple seeds fall in my life time and I have never seen one stop falling suddenly.
 
chrisbaird said:
That floating at the very end of the video must be a very subtle effect or be just the camera getting bumped. I have watched a lot of real maple seeds fall in my life time and I have never seen one stop falling suddenly.

I think what happens at the end of the video is the seed lands on a table that can't be seen.

Thanks for help in understanding this!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K