Minimizing Positive Terms in a Sequence with Alternating Signs

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on minimizing the number of positive terms in the sequence defined by A=$1\triangle2\triangle3---------\triangle2008\triangle2009=1$, where $\triangle$ can be either "$+$" or "$-$". The optimal solution involves selecting the 588 largest numbers from 1422 to 2009 to be positive, alongside one additional positive term to achieve the desired sum of 1. The total number of positive terms required is 589, ensuring the sum of positive terms exceeds the sum of negative terms by exactly 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic equations and quadratic solutions
  • Familiarity with arithmetic series and their sums
  • Knowledge of positive and negative integer manipulation in sequences
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and symbols
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of arithmetic sequences and their sums
  • Learn about quadratic equations and their applications in problem-solving
  • Explore optimization techniques in mathematical sequences
  • Investigate combinatorial methods for minimizing terms in sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in optimization problems involving sequences and sums.

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
A=$1\triangle2\triangle3---------\triangle2008\triangle2009=1$
where $\triangle$ can be replaced only by eather "$+$" or "$-$" , find the least number of "$+$" can be ued to make A=1
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
A=$1\triangle2\triangle3---------\triangle2008\triangle2009=1$
where $\triangle$ can be replaced only by either "$+$" or "$-$" , find the least number of "$+$" can be used to make A=1
[sp]For the whole sum to be equal to $1$, the sum of the positive terms must be almost the same as the sum of the negative terms. In order to minimise the number of positive terms, it seems clear that we should take the positive terms to be as large as possible (so that there will be fewest of them).

Writing $n$ for $2009$, the sum of all the numbers from $1$ to $n$ is $\frac12n(n+1).$ Suppose that there is a number $r < n$ such that the sum of the $r$ largest numbers in the sequence (namely the numbers $n-r+1$ to $n$ inclusive) is exactly half of the total. The condition for that is $$rn - \tfrac12r(r-1) = \tfrac14n(n+1).$$ Solve that quadratic equation for $r$ to get $$r = \tfrac12\bigl(2n+1 - \sqrt{2n^2 + 2n + 1}\bigr)$$ (taking the negative sign for the square root to ensure that $r<n$). Plugging in the value $n=2009$, I get $r = 588.56...$.

So it looks as though we should take the $588$ largest numbers on the sequence (namely $1422$ to $2009$ inclusive) to have positive signs, and then to have just one further positive term to make the sum of the positive terms $1$ more than the sum of the remaining (negative) terms.

In fact, the sum of all the numbers from $1$ to $2009$ is $2019045$. Half of that is $1009522.5$. So we want the sum of the positive numbers in the sequence to be $1009523$, and the sum of the negative numbers in the sequence to be $1009522.$ The first term in the sum (namely $1$) has no $\triangle$ in front of it, so must necessarily be positive. The sum of the numbers $1422$ to $2009$ is $1008714$, leaving a shortfall of $1009523 - 1008715 = 808$ for the sum of the positive terms.

Thus the minimal number of positive terms is given by taking the numbers $808$, and $1422$ to $2009$ inclusive, to be preceded by $\triangle = +$, and all the remaining triangles to be $\triangle = -.$ That gives the minimal number of "$+$" triangles to be $589.$[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]For the whole sum to be equal to $1$, the sum of the positive terms must be almost the same as the sum of the negative terms. In order to minimise the number of positive terms, it seems clear that we should take the positive terms to be as large as possible (so that there will be fewest of them).

Writing $n$ for $2009$, the sum of all the numbers from $1$ to $n$ is $\frac12n(n+1).$ Suppose that there is a number $r < n$ such that the sum of the $r$ largest numbers in the sequence (namely the numbers $n-r+1$ to $n$ inclusive) is exactly half of the total. The condition for that is $$rn - \tfrac12r(r-1) = \tfrac14n(n+1).$$ Solve that quadratic equation for $r$ to get $$r = \tfrac12\bigl(2n+1 - \sqrt{2n^2 + 2n + 1}\bigr)$$ (taking the negative sign for the square root to ensure that $r<n$). Plugging in the value $n=2009$, I get $r = 588.56...$.

So it looks as though we should take the $588$ largest numbers on the sequence (namely $1422$ to $2009$ inclusive) to have positive signs, and then to have just one further positive term to make the sum of the positive terms $1$ more than the sum of the remaining (negative) terms.

In fact, the sum of all the numbers from $1$ to $2009$ is $2019045$. Half of that is $1009522.5$. So we want the sum of the positive numbers in the sequence to be $1009523$, and the sum of the negative numbers in the sequence to be $1009522.$ The first term in the sum (namely $1$) has no $\triangle$ in front of it, so must necessarily be positive. The sum of the numbers $1422$ to $2009$ is $1008714$, leaving a shortfall of $1009523 - 1008715 = 808$ for the sum of the positive terms.

Thus the minimal number of positive terms is given by taking the numbers $808$, and $1422$ to $2009$ inclusive, to be preceded by $\triangle = +$, and all the remaining triangles to be $\triangle = -.$ That gives the minimal number of "$+$" triangles to be $589.$[/sp]
very good !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K