Minimum angle to prevent sliding (Friction & Forces)

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum angle of a hill that prevents a refrigerator from slipping during braking, the problem involves balancing forces using Newton's second law. The maximum acceleration while braking is 9 m/s², and the static friction coefficient is 0.4 with the refrigerator mass at 150 kg. The equations derived include the force of friction and gravitational forces, leading to a simplified equation involving trigonometric functions. A suggestion was made to manipulate the equation into a specific trigonometric form to facilitate solving for the angle. The discussion emphasizes the need for trigonometric manipulation rather than calculus to find the minimum angle.
tachyon_man
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose a truck is going up a hill and the maximum acceleration while braking is 9 m/s2. Find the minimum angle of the hill such that the driver can brake at maximum rate without the refrigerator on back slipping. (coefficient of static friction between truck and refrigerator is 0.4 Mass of refrigerator is 150kg)

Homework Equations



Im using Newtons second law and got it down to (force of friction) 588 * cos θ + (force of gravity down the slope) 1470N * sin θ = 1350N (force required to prevent refrigerator from slipping)The above formula can be simplified into purely accelerations :
3.92 * cos θ + 9.8 * sin θ = 9

The Attempt at a Solution



I got it about as far as I mentioned in 2. I'm not sure whether I have to use some calculus to solve this but don't know how I'd go about it because I want the minimum angle. This is when the maximum force of static friction and the force down the slope of gravity = force required to prevent it from slipping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your equation. You just need a bit of trig to solve it.
Can you massage it into the form cos(α) sin(θ) + sin(α) cos(θ) = c?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top