Minimum period of rotation and gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum period of rotation for a planet with uniform mass density to avoid disintegration due to excessive rotation. The equation for the minimum period of rotation is derived as T = (3 pi)^(1/2) * (G p)^(1/2). A specific density of 5.5 g/cm^3 is provided to calculate the minimum T. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the given density and understanding the relationship between rotation period and velocity. Clarification is sought on the relevance of derivatives in this context, indicating a need for deeper analysis of the equations involved.
Tonyt88
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a planet with uniform mass density p. If the planet rotates too fast, it will fly apart. Show that the minimum period of rotation is given by:

T = (3 pi)^(1/2)
...(G p)^(1/2)

What is the minimum T if p = 5.5 g/cm^3?



Homework Equations



T = 2 pi r
...v

v = (G m)^(1/2)
...(r)^(1/2)



The Attempt at a Solution



I combined the two equations to have:

T = 2 pi (r)^(3/2)
...(G m)^(1/2)

I found dr/dT to have:

3 pi (r)^(1/2)
(G m)^(1/2)

What am I doing incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does dr/dT relate to this problem?

Read the question carefully, and try to use the "givens." In this case, you are required to find the minimum of period of rotation, which is given as a function of the velcocity.

Your substitution was right. Note that the planet's density is also provided. Remember that density = mass.volume
 
Hmmm, so am I not supposed to find a derivative somewhere, or?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top