Minimum value of the electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum electric field at the surface of the inner sphere of a spherical capacitor, specifically when the radius of the inner sphere (a) is half that of the outer sphere (b). Participants clarify that with a constant potential difference (Δϕ), the charge (Q) varies as the outer radius (b) changes, while the inner radius (a) is adjusted to minimize the electric field. The relationship between the electric field and the potential difference is established through equations involving Q, a, and b, leading to the conclusion that the electric field can be minimized by varying these parameters. The conversation emphasizes understanding the integral relationship between electric field and potential difference to solve the problem effectively. The final consensus is that the electric field at the inner sphere's surface reaches a minimum when a equals b/2.
Jason Williams
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The potential difference Δϕ between the plates of a spherical capacitor is kept constant. Show that the electric field at the surface of the inner sphere will be a minimum at a = b/2, where a is the radius of the inner sphere and b is the radius of the outer sphere.

Homework Equations



E = Q/(4*pi*ϵ0*r^2) between the inner and outer shells and E = sigma/ϵ0 at the surface of a conductor... sorry guys, I'm in a rush and I'm new to Physics Forums so please bear with me noobiness.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using E = -dV/dr, setting it equal to 0 and then solving for r, but that clearly doesn't give us the answer. I'm really just confused about how I should even be approaching this problem, and how to extract the E-field from the potential difference.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Jason, Welcome to PF!

Can you express ##\Delta \phi## in terms of ##a, b## and ##Q##?

Hint: Think about the integral relationship between ##\Delta \phi## and ##E##.
 
Thanks for the reply and so glad to be here!

Well we know \Delta \phi= Q*(1/a - 1/b)/(4*pi*epsilon), which we get from doing the integral of E.ds

But here's where I'm getting stuck. I'm trying to reason it out and I'm thinking that maybe the electric field is a minimum when the potential difference between point "a" and point "b" is at a minimum?
 
Jason Williams said:
Well we know \Delta \phi= Q*(1/a - 1/b)/(4*pi*epsilon), which we get from doing the integral of E.ds
OK, good.

Note that ##\Delta \phi## is fixed. It's assumed to be held constant as you vary ##b##. Does ##Q## vary as ##b## varies?
 
Last edited:
Right so if \Delta \phi is fixed, the only thing that can be changed are $$a$$ and $$b$$, which then alter the electric field. I don't think Q would change as we vary $$b$$ because we set the inner conductor to have charge $$Q$$ in the beginning.
 
The potential difference ##\Delta \phi## and ##a## are held fixed. You then want to vary ##b## so that Eb is a minimum, where Eb is the field at the outer conductor.

[CORRECTION: See post #13.]

Q is not fixed. You can think of the capacitor as connected to a battery that keeps ##\Delta \phi## constant. As you vary the separation between the plates, the battery will change Q in order to keep the potential difference fixed.

Can you think of a way to relate Q to b and Eb?
 
Last edited:
Okay the battery analogy makes sense. But isn't the question asking us to show that the electric field at the surface of the inner sphere will be a minimum if a = b/2?
 
Yes. Can you find Eb as a function of b? You have all the necessary equations.
 
Yes, E_b = Q/(4*pi*ϵ0*b^2). I'm sorry for being so slow, but I still don't understand how that helps. Using that, equation, we have two things that change, both Q and b.
 
  • #10
You have another equation that relates Q to ##\Delta \phi## and b.
 
  • #11
Okay, so using $$ E_b = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0b^2} $$ and $$ Q = \Delta \phi \frac{(4\pi\epsilon_0)}{(\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b})} $$, giving us $$ E = \frac{\Delta \phi}{(\frac{b^2}{a} - b)} $$.

And then we find the minimum from there. Okay, I think I got it now. Thank you so much for all your help and patience!
 
  • #12
Good.
 
  • #13
OOPS! Sorry, Jason. Somehow I misread the problem as minimizing the field at r = b. Instead, you want to minimize the field at r = a. Looks like you need to assume b is fixed and vary a.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ahh okay, yeah that's what I figured and changed it in my homework. Thanks so much again!
 
Back
Top