Mistakes in Kinematics Problem: A Lesson in Precision and Accuracy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights several mistakes in a kinematics problem, particularly the incorrect use of time and displacement values. Participants point out that the time of 24 seconds should not be used when the calculated time is 6.16 seconds, leading to confusion in displacement calculations. Additionally, errors in scientific notation and final velocity calculations are noted, with the correct final velocity being 12.07 m/s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision and accuracy in physics problems, as well as the need for double-checking work. Overall, the thread serves as a valuable resource for students to learn from these mistakes.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Please look at pictures.

Why is it that they use 24 seconds for the time in b)? They get t=6.16s, why do they not plug that into the Dx equation to get 185m of x displacement?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 6.22.57 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 6.22.57 PM.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 465
  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 6.23.05 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 6.23.05 PM.png
    15.8 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
alingy1 said:
Please look at pictures.

Why is it that they use 24 seconds for the time in b)? They get t=6.16s, why do they not plug that into the Dx equation to get 185m of x displacement?
Looks like a mistake.
 
DocAl, is the speed also wrong in this problem? I think they made a mistake right at the end. They forgot to square root?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.09.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.09.07 PM.png
    15.7 KB · Views: 472
  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.09.14 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.09.14 PM.png
    20.1 KB · Views: 478
alingy1 said:
DocAl, is the speed also wrong in this problem? I think they made a mistake right at the end. They forgot to square root?
You are right. They made a mistake.

What book are you using?
 
It's a bunch of review problems my teacher sent me "at our own risk."

But, since I'm not really an ace in physics, I try to confirm the mistakes as much as possible.
 
Another mistake spotted?

They made a mistake with the *10^4. Should be 10^3. Angles do not change (they are good).
The final velocity should be 12.07m/s, IE 43.45 km/h.

By the way, should we not express scientific notation with only numbers from 1 to 9? Why do they put 10.1 x 10^4 etc...?

I'll refer this page to my class. They'll be glad :)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.42.13 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.42.13 PM.png
    41 KB · Views: 434
  • Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.42.39 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 7.42.39 PM.png
    14 KB · Views: 445
alingy1 said:
It's a bunch of review problems my teacher sent me "at our own risk."
I guess he didn't double check them for errors.

But, since I'm not really an ace in physics, I try to confirm the mistakes as much as possible.
Good idea. It's good practice.
 
alingy1 said:
Another mistake spotted?

They made a mistake with the *10^4. Should be 10^3. Angles do not change (they are good).
The final velocity should be 12.07m/s, IE 43.45 km/h.
Yes, another mistake.

By the way, should we not express scientific notation with only numbers from 1 to 9? Why do they put 10.1 x 10^4 etc...?
As long as they do it right, it doesn't really matter. (Though you are correct.) But that's their first mistake: The momentum values are off by a factor of ten: they have 29.2 x 10^4 instead of 2.92 x 10^4, etc.

I'll refer this page to my class. They'll be glad :)
Good!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top