I Optimal Copper Pipe Size for Misting System

AI Thread Summary
Attaching a 5/8" garden hose at 70psi to a copper pipe capped with mist nozzles requires careful consideration of pressure consistency. The pressure drop in the system will depend on the water flow rate, which needs to be quantified based on the expected output from the nozzles. Using 3/4" copper may provide better pressure consistency than 1/2" copper, especially with higher flow rates. A lower flow rate, such as a pint per minute, may work well, but a gallon per minute could lead to significant pressure issues. Ensuring the right pipe size and flow rate is crucial for optimal misting performance.
ljmorlock
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Figuring for pressure change due to an increase or decrease in pipe size
I am attaching a standard 5/8" garden hose with approximately 70psi pressure to a copper pipe that is capped on the opposite end with mist nozzles mounted periodically along its length. I want the pressure at each mister to be as similar as possible. The hose attaches at the base, a solid line goes 8 feet vertically and then the misters are mounted on a horizontal portion. For my copper lines I have 3/4" copper and 1/2" copper and I am wondering which I should use to have consistency after coming out of the 5/8" hose and into the misting system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @ljmorlock
Pressure drop for the pipes ( and the garden hose ) will be a factor of the amount of water flow, a factor that you need to quantify by the amount of water ( expected ) to come out of the nozzles.
A pint a minute might be OK, a gallon a minute might not.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top