Mixture Mass & Mole Relationships: A General Overview

AI Thread Summary
In a mixture, the average molar mass (M(average)) can be defined such that the total mass (m(total)) equals the total number of moles (n(total)) multiplied by M(average). This relationship holds true as M(average) equals the summation of the products of the mole fractions (x(Species)) and the relative molecular masses (M(species)) of all species in the mixture. The equivalence of these definitions is confirmed through mathematical manipulation, demonstrating their validity across all types of mixtures, including solid phases. The discussion emphasizes that this is a fundamental mathematical principle, applicable regardless of the substances involved. Therefore, the relationship between mass and mole in mixtures is consistently reliable.
Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1
This is a more general question: is it always true for a mixture that if we define M(average) such that m(total) = n(total) * M(average), where n(total) is the total number of moles of species in the mixture (summed over all species) and m(total) is the total mass of the mixture, then M(average) = Ʃ (x(Species) * M(species)) where M(species) is the relative molecular mass of that species and x(Species) is the mole fraction of that species in the mixture, and the summation occurs over all species in the mixture? Is this true for any mixture, including solid phase substances?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just a weighted average.
Multiply both sides of your second equation with n(total) and you get the first equation, both definitions are equivalent.

It is mathematics, so it true independent of the substances you have.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top