Model Rocket Help: Achieve a Glide for Contest

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a model rocket that can achieve a glide after a vertical takeoff, specifically for a contest where the rocket must not jettison any parts and must glide down in large, slow circles. Participants explore various design ideas and challenges related to achieving effective gliding without violating contest rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that wings are essential for achieving glide, while another initially considers them optional.
  • Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of wings during liftoff, with one participant mentioning that a balsa wood wing snapped during launch.
  • Some participants propose the idea of folding wings that deploy during descent, with discussions on mechanisms for deployment.
  • There is a suggestion to use servos and larger wings for better control, although this is challenged as it may violate the vertical takeoff requirement.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of designing the vehicle for long hang time rather than just focusing on deployment mechanisms.
  • Another participant proposes using swept wings that could fold out at maximum altitude to enhance gliding capability.
  • Questions arise about the allowance of ailerons and the restrictions on changing the shape of the wings significantly.
  • A reference to historical missile designs is made, suggesting looking into past engineering solutions for inspiration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of wings for gliding, but there is disagreement on the specifics of wing design, deployment mechanisms, and contest restrictions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to meet the contest requirements while achieving effective gliding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the structural integrity of wings during launch and the contest rules that restrict significant shape changes. There is also a focus on the implementation challenges of proposed ideas.

Eliott b 12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to build a model rocket for a contest. It goes up as a rocket but comes down as a glider. Vertical takeoff. Does not jettison any parts. Should glide down in large slow graceful circles. Judged based on total hang time. I have been able to avoid a outright nose dive by putting the cp really close behind the cg, but haven't achieved a glide. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wings? ;)
 
Yes they are an option. I used a long flat balsa wood wing but the wood snapped a short distance from the body during liftoff
 
If you're looking to have it glide, wings are not an "option"; they are mandatory.

(Well, I suppose alternately you could have a parachute.)
 
parachute not allowed
 
How do you expect to achieve any glide if you are still considering wings as optional?
 
To expand on what Dave said (which is certainly true) can you see a way to arrange wings so that they don't snap off at liftoff but DO have an effect on the way down? I see one immediate solution that I believe could be made to work
 
You can launch whit rocket something like this (rocket propelled UAV) dependent on rockets useful payload mass:
AIR_UAV_Skylark-I-LE_from_Below_lg.jpg


Alternatively you can use servos ,larger wings and remote controller to control flight
9b0413cc14dff51eacf87811b35456a9.jpg
 
elementHTTP said:
You can launch whit rocket something like this (rocket propelled UAV) dependent on rockets useful payload mass:
Violates the condition of vertical takeoff.
Alternatively you can use servos ,larger wings and remote controller to control flight
Violates the condition of coming back like a glider.

I realize you are being creative here, but you are not answering the question as asked. I have taken the requirements as being part of the problem to be solved.
 
  • #10
Can you design it so that the wings will fold up and deploy when the rocket is falling? I know that some rockets deploy a parachute with a small detonation, so maybe you can use that to forcibly deploy some wings.
 
  • #11
timthereaper said:
Can you design it so that the wings will fold up and deploy when the rocket is falling? I know that some rockets deploy a parachute with a small detonation, so maybe you can use that to forcibly deploy some wings.
This is what I was trying to lead the OP to (the deployment, although not quite your method), rather than spoon-feeding him the solution, since spoon-feeding is frowned on here on PF.
 
  • #12
phinds said:
This is what I was trying to lead the OP to (the deployment, although not quite your method), rather than spoon-feeding him the solution, since spoon-feeding is frowned on here on PF.

Sorry @phinds! I didn't catch what you were trying to do. I guess subtlety isn't my strong suit. I figured the real challenge would be to design the vehicle for a long hang time, not in coming up with mechanisms for deployment. To me, ideas are a dime a dozen, but implementation is going to be where Eliott will really have to stretch and think.
 
  • #13
timthereaper said:
Sorry @phinds! I didn't catch what you were trying to do. I guess subtlety isn't my strong suit. I figured the real challenge would be to design the vehicle for a long hang time, not in coming up with mechanisms for deployment. To me, ideas are a dime a dozen, but implementation is going to be where Eliott will really have to stretch and think.
Yeah, I sometimes get carried away too by my interest in a problem and coming up with a solution and forget that we're here to help folks figure out how to do that for themselves. I often have to bite my tongue, so to speak, so I know where you're coming from. And yes, you're right that implementation will be non-trivial but you DO have to figure out first just what it is that you want to implement and that's what I wanted to lead him to.
 
  • #14
Phinds- next I will try having them make shorter, and I guess tapered.
Dave- I meant they are allowed
Time- it's not allowed to change shape significantly
 
  • #15
Eliott b 12 said:
Phinds- next I will try having them make shorter, and I guess tapered.
Dave- I meant they are allowed
Time- it's not allowed to change shape significantly
Hm ... not sure that will do the job. I had in mind a variation on the reaper's suggestion ... wings that are unobtrusive at liftoff but spread out at apogee
 
  • #16
Aileron allowed ?
 
  • #17
Eliott b 12 said:
not allowed to change shape significantly
What is this? Something from a BOMARC missile design competition from the 50s? Hit the library for old "Jane's" and start looking at Snark, Matador, Bomarc, designs.
 
  • #18
Wings which fold out sounds like a good idea. Could also use swept wings as the stabilizers during launch configuration. Once at max altitude the swept wings could fold out (like on the F-14) into a more or less glider configuration. You will need a second set of stabilizers behind the main wing though for flight stability.
 
  • #19
Well, since I let the cat out of the bag, here's a US military adaptation of this kind of rocket/plane:

-- watch 46:08-46:50
-- for a more promotional video,

You could do something along these lines.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K