Modeling of moist-adiabatic temperature?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the moist-adiabatic temperature of an air parcel ascending from the surface to the troposphere, considering initial conditions like temperature, pressure, and humidity. Key factors include the assumption of isolation from surrounding air, the impact of latent heat from condensation and freezing, and estimating rain from condensed water. Participants suggest using keywords like orographic rain, adiabatic lapse rate, and katabatic for further research. There is also a suggestion to develop the equations for the problem independently and consider variations in conditions such as dry air or non-condensing water. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of meteorological principles and equations related to moist-adiabatic processes.
Aleksej
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to find some good article or book related to the modeling of this process:

the parcel of air goes up from the surface to the top of troposphere ( to 12000 m ),
we know the conditions at the bottom such as temperature, pressure and humidity,
we assume that
the parcel is isolated from the surrounding air so it is the moist-adiabatic process,
part of the condensed water can rain down from the parcel ( need some estimate ),
it is necessary to model the temperature of this parcel with taking into account the
latent heat of condensation and freezing.

It would be nice to find even some good keywords for this.

Alexey
 
Science news on Phys.org
Orographic rain, adiabatic lapse rate, katabatic, should get you started far as keywords. General reading? Grab a meteorological handbook.
 
This sounds suspiciously like a homework problem in sheep's clothing. Is it a homework problem?

Have you considered developing the equations for this problem yourself?
Could you do it if the air was bone dry?
Could you do it if the water was present but did not condense?
Could you do it if the condensed water were not removed?

Chet
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
9K