Modern Quantum Mechanics: J.J. Sakurai's eq. (1.7.31) Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter omoplata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sakurai
omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
From "Modern Quantum Mechanics, revised edition" by J.J. Sakurai, page 56.

In equation (1.7.31) it is given,
\begin{eqnarray}<br /> \delta(x&#039; - x&#039;&#039;) &amp; = &amp; | N |^2 \int dp&#039; \exp \left[ \frac{ip&#039;(x&#039;-x&#039;&#039;)}{\hbar} \right] \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; 2 \pi \hbar | N |^2 \delta(x&#039; - x&#039;&#039; )<br /> \end{eqnarray}
How does the right side happen. Is this a definition of the delta function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a Fourier transform.

To see this the Fourier transformation is given by
\mathcal{F}[\delta (x)] = \int \delta (x)\exp \left(-i2\pi px\right) dx = \frac{1}{2\pi}\exp (0) = \frac{1}{2\pi}
Inverse transformation gives
\delta(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int \exp \left( ipx\right) dp

And thus \int \exp \left(ipx\right) dp = 2\pi \delta (x)

Can you see it now?
 
Last edited:
Actually, δ(x) = (1/2π) ∫eipx dp
 
Ok, my bad. Been 3 years since I actually 'performed' a Fourier transformation. Should've checked it
I forgot the 2\pi factor in the exponential.
 
OK, I see it now. Thanks.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top