Molecular bionics vs. mechatronics - can't decide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a high school student in Hungary, Tusike, who is deciding between pursuing physics or molecular bionics for university. Tusike expresses a strong preference for physics but is considering molecular bionics due to perceived future job prospects. Concerns are raised about the lack of physics in molecular bionics compared to mechatronics, leading to questions about the viability of pursuing both fields simultaneously or studying physics independently alongside bionics. Participants emphasize the importance of a broad educational foundation, suggesting that physics and math are valuable for any scientific career. There is skepticism about the job market for molecular bionics in Hungary, with a recommendation to consider established fields like mechanical engineering for better job security. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of personal interests, job market trends, and the benefits of a solid foundational education.
Tusike
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm currently in 12th grade here in Hungary (= last year of high school), and have to decide which university I want to go to, and which course I want to take.
I'm mainly interested in physics and a bit less in biology, programming and math. Don't get me wrong I like those as well, but if I had to chose just one it'd be physics. Anyway, I heard that there's a greater future for molecular bionics, so I should go there; but then again, molecular bionics doesn't have as much physics in it as mechatronics, and I'd regret that very much.
So please, if anyone has any suggestions as to which one I should chose and why, that'd be very much appreciated.

Also, perhaps there are alternatives? I was thinking about starting one, and starting the other half a year / a year later, and doing them parallel. Would that be worth it? I mean does having both degrees really give a much bigger advantage in getting good jobs than just one? Unfortunately I only get to go to one of the for free. Or perhaps I could go to bionics and study extra physics on my own? I'm not so sure about the depth of that studying...

Thanks in advance,
-Tusike

PS: Sorry for my english, e.g. by "course" I mean like a field to get a job in as in the two mentioned in the topic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My best advice to almost any student would be to choose a broad program (physics is good), so you get good foundations before deciding on your specialization. It's not easy to know beforehand if you're going to like the subject until you actually study it at the higher level. For the same reason, it's good to try other things, you might not know you like something yet.

If you intend to do anything science-rated, you can't really go wrong studying physics and math. Even if you go into some other field it's a good foundation to build on.

Jó szerencsét!
 
Thanks :)

I'm not sure if it's a good idea to go as a physician and then chose between molecular bionics and mechatronics. It just seems to me like an awful lot of time before I get a masters in one of the latters.
 
"Anyway, I heard that there's a greater future for molecular bionics, so I should go there; but then again, molecular bionics doesn't have as much physics in it as mechatronics, and I'd regret that very much."


Are they hiring mechatronic or molecular-bionical (I'm sure that's not even a word) engineers in Hungary?
 
Mechatronic engineers, yes, the other one I don't think so since it's so new that no one has completed the course yet (at least here); but I didn't say anything about wanting to work in Hungary:)
 
Personally, I would stay within an established discipline, eg Mechanical engineering.

The classics never go out of style.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top