Molecular States, Symmetry and Allowed Transitions

tomothy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have a question about allowed transitions and molecular states. For an electric dipole transition between two states (say molecular or atomic) to have a non-zero probability of occurring, the transition dipole moment \langle \psi_{f}|\textbf{μ}\left|\psi_{i} \right \rangle must be non-zero. This can be determined by considering the irreducible symmetry representations to which each state/operator belongs i.e. \Gamma ( \psi_{f} ) \otimes \Gamma \left(x,y,z \right) \otimes \Gamma \left(\psi_{i}\right) must contain the totally symmetric irreducible representation at least once.

My question is, are the initial states and final states to be considered the overall molecular states or the individual single electron states? e.g. in diatomic hydrogen, for a \sigma_{g} \rightarrow \sigma_{u} transition, are the initial and final states the electron states of the electron being excited or the overall initial and final molecular states (i.e. of both electrons)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the many-electron state that must be considered.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top