To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which of two cubes has a larger moment of inertia and the reasoning behind it. One participant believes the right cube has a larger moment of inertia due to its rotation not being around the principal axes, while another emphasizes the need for calculations to confirm this. The conversation touches on the relevant equations for calculating moment of inertia, specifically mentioning the relationship between arbitrary and parallel axes. There is a suggestion to first analyze a 2-D case for better understanding before applying it to the cubes. The need for precise calculations is highlighted as essential for a definitive answer.
Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
untitled.JPG

I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cosmossos said:
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
View attachment 23012
I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?

Why do you say the right one? Are you familiar with the relevant equation for calculating the moment of inertia?
 
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Cosmossos said:
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?

There may be a shortcut way to tell which has a higher moment of inertia, but for me, I'd need to calculate it. I'd use the standard definition of the Mmoment of inertia, and evaluate thge integral for the diagonal case. I don't think you can use the parallel axis theorm, since the two axes are not parallel.

I'd do the 2-D case first, to see if it offered some intuition. That is, the moment of inertia for a flat rectangular sheet, with the axes going straight versus diagonal.
 
I think they'll turn out to be equal. Try computing the moment of inertia tensor.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top