Moment of Inertia: 3 Point Mass, Massless Rods, Rotational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia calculation for the system of three point masses, each 110 kg and connected by massless rods, is correctly computed as 5019.3 kg m². The center of mass being at the rotation point simplifies the calculation since the distribution of mass does not affect the moment of inertia for point masses. If the masses were distributed differently, such as in the form of disks or spheres, the parallel axis theorem would need to be applied. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding mass distribution when calculating moment of inertia. Overall, the initial calculation is valid for the given configuration.
Celestiela
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Simple question:

I have 3 point masses of 110 kg apiece. All are connected by 3 massless rods to a massless point in the middle. The system will rotate about that point in the middle. The rods are 3.9 m long. They are 120 degrees apart from each other like:

.|
/ \

Kinda. Anyways, when I'm calculating the moment of interia, am I correct in saying saying (110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)=5019.3 kg m^2? Do I need to worry about the way the weight is distributed? Or is everything ok because the center of mass is at that point? What if it wasn't? I think I'm confusing the two...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Celestiela said:
Simple question:

I have 3 point masses of 110 kg apiece. All are connected by 3 massless rods to a massless point in the middle. The system will rotate about that point in the middle. The rods are 3.9 m long. They are 120 degrees apart from each other like:

.|
/ \

Kinda. Anyways, when I'm calculating the moment of interia, am I correct in saying saying (110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)+(110 kg)(3.9 m)(3.9 m)=5019.3 kg m^2? Do I need to worry about the way the weight is distributed? Or is everything ok because the center of mass is at that point? What if it wasn't? I think I'm confusing the two...

Your calculation is correct for point masses, which is what you were given. If each of those masses were distributed in some way (like disks or spheres) a correct calculation would involve the parallel axis theorem. Each term in your sum would then have an additional term that depended on the shape of the mass.
 
sweet! Thanks! :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top