Moment of inertia for Concave Polygon

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a concave polygon, triangulating the shape is a viable approach, allowing for the summation of the moments of the individual triangles. An alternative method involves decomposing the concave polygon into two convex polygons, where one represents the material and the other represents the void, combining their moments with opposite signs. This discussion highlights the importance of these techniques in simplifying the calculation process. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification on these methods. Overall, triangulation and decomposition are effective strategies for determining the moment of inertia in concave polygons.
SaadAhmad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Moment of inertia for Concave Polygon

While working on a simulation I ran into this problem. I'm trying to calculate the moment of inertia for a concave polygon. The polygon is made of N vertices (Also the edges are straight lines). I've done a bit of researching however I've only found resources for convex polygons.

I'm thinking of triangulating the polygon and then going from there, but I don't know how to actually use it.

I will be grateful for any help on a general way of calculating the moment of inertia for a concave polygon


Saad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you triangulate the polygon, can't you just sum the moments of the triangles? In the case of simple polygons you can also use the trick of trying to decompose it into two convex polygons, where one is the place where material is, and the other is the place where it isn't and add them with opposite signs.
 
Ah yes, I was over thinking it. Thanks for your help
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top