Moment of inertia of a point mass

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia (I) of a point mass (m) is calculated using the formula I = m * r^2, where r represents the distance from the axis of rotation. This distance is crucial as it determines how the mass contributes to the rotational inertia about that axis. The moment of inertia must be referenced to a specific point or axis, with the minimum value occurring when the reference is through the center of mass (CM). For a point mass, the moment of inertia is zero when the axis of rotation passes through its location. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing rotational dynamics.
geekie weekie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This is a very basic question. Wikipedia says moment of inertia I of a point mass m is calculated as:

I = m * r^2

Where, r is distance from the axis of rotation. What this actually mean? I mean what is an r?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
geekie weekie said:
Where, r is distance from the axis of rotation. What this actually mean? I mean what is an r?

It is a distance, expressed in units of length (meters in the SI).
 
__________________________________________________________________________



this is axis of rotation and in front ist point mass not full stop .

it's at r dist from rod

I=mr2
 
moment of inertia of a point mass with respect to an axis is the product of mass times the distance of the axis
squared.So "r" is the distance of the mass "m" from the axis of roation.
 
Moment of Inertia of an object has to be referenced to a particular point or axis. Take any object and its MI is a minimum when that reference is through the CM. For a point mass, it is Zero.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top