Moment of inertia of a rod about an axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a rod with a non-constant mass per unit length defined as λ = λ₀x. Participants express confusion over the integration process and the use of absolute values in the formula. It is clarified that the absolute value is necessary because the integration limits range from -L/2 to L/2, ensuring the correct distance is accounted for. The correct moment of inertia is derived as I = (1/8)ML², and participants are encouraged to combine equations to express λ₀ in terms of the total mass M. Overall, the integration method and understanding of the density function are key points of focus in resolving the problem.
Supernerd2004
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Find the moment of inertia of a rod about an axis through its center if the mass per unit length is lambda = lambda (sub zero) time X.
Answer (I = (1/8) M L^2)

This problem is totally throwing me off. Normally lambda is equal to (M/L) so I am not sure what this new formula is doing to the problem. I tried substituting and came up with (1/32)ML^3 which is horribly off from the answer. My idea was to add the x term from the new lambda giving me x^3. I then brought lambda (sub zero) out of the integral and integrated from (-L/2) to positive (L/2). Which brings us back to the wrong answer. Any ideas as to where I’m going wrong would be much appreciated!

Thanks

Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found this thread on the internet, but I guess it still doesn't clear things up.

"Okay, I'll do the first one for you.

The line density is given as \lambda=\lambda_{0}x

It's no wonder that you are stuck with this exercise, because this expression is by itself meaningless.
The correct expression must be:

\lambda=\lambda_{0}|x|, -L/2<=x<=L/2
i.e the absolute value of x, rather than x itself.
(I assume you gave us ALL the information present in the exercise?)
We gain:

I=\int_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}}\lambda_{0}|x|{x}^{2}dx= \lambda_{0}\frac{2}{4}(\frac{L}{2})^{4}

The mass M of the rod is readily calculated:

M=\int_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}}\lambda_{0}|x|dx=\lambda _{0}(\frac{L}{2})^{2}

Combining the expressions yiels the desired result"

I guess at this point I just need a little help understanding the integration that took place. The absolute value of X is a little confusing. Thanks again in advance!

Here is the problem again in more readable text:

Find the moment of inertia of a rod about an axis through its center if the mass per unit length is \lambda=\lambda_o x.

Answer: I=\frac 1 8 ML^2

Dan
 
It just means that the density is given as 0 at the axis and as \lambda_0 x at a distance x away from the axis.

You have to use the absolute value because you are integrating x from -L/2 to L/2, but you are concerned about the distance. The distance to the point -L/2 on the rod is L/2 so it follows that if x is -L/2 and you want the distance to x you want the absolute value.
 
Last edited:
Oh, so the density of the rod is not constant. That part makes sense, but why was an equation for the mass given? The other thread explains that combining the equations gives the result, but it just isn't making sense yet. Thanks so much for your help,

Dan
 
It depends on how you interpret the problem. It says the mass per unit length is \lambda=\lambda_0 x. I assumed (as did the site where you got the solution from) that x is the distance from the axis to any point on the rod. So if you are looking for the density a distance L/4 away then it would be \lambda_0\frac{L}{4}

You need to combine your equations because the calculated moment of inertia I=\lambda_{0}\frac{2}{4}(\frac{L}{2})^{4} is still in terms of \lambda_0. You can solve for \lambda_0 in terms of M using the second integration that gave M=\lambda _{0}(\frac{L}{2})^{2}
 
Last edited:
Supernerd2004 said:
I guess at this point I just need a little help understanding the integration that took place. The absolute value of X is a little confusing. Thanks again in advance!
Since the integrand is symmetric with respect to the origin, just integrate the positive side and double it.

Here is the problem again in more readable text:

Find the moment of inertia of a rod about an axis through its center if the mass per unit length is \lambda=\lambda_o x.
I find that statement odd. If \lambda_o has units of \lambda, then \lambda_o x cannot. I presume it should read (I haven't checked it) something like: \lambda=\lambda_o |x|/(L/2)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top