Moment of inertia of an ellipse formula

AI Thread Summary
The formula for the moment of inertia of an ellipse about its centroidal axis is M*(a^2 + b^2)/4, which is confirmed as correct. The alternative formula found on a webpage, Pi*a*(b^3)/4, refers to the area moment of inertia, not the mass moment of inertia. It's important to distinguish between these two concepts to avoid confusion. Understanding the definitions of area moment and mass moment of inertia is crucial for accurate calculations. The initial formula provided is indeed valid for the mass moment of inertia.
Vineeth T
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
hello!
I have to verify the formula of the moment of inertia of an ellipse about its' centroidal axis,
is it M*(a^2 + b^2)/4.This is the one I got by myself.
But in a webpage it was given as Pi*a*(b^3)/4.

NOTE: don't ask for the proof of what I did.Its' a bit longer.I just want to know whether its' correct or
not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing things up. The Quantity given on the webpage is is the "Area moment of Intertia" not the mass moment of inertia. Read on the two quantities and then you will see what to do...
 
Ok then what I found out was correct.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Moment of Inertia of Rectangles
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Moment of inertia of human body with limbs at an angle
Replies
12
Views
2K
Why Do Different Objects Share Similar Moments of Inertia?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Moment of inertia where mass and torque are at a different positions
2
Replies
69
Views
5K
How can I calculate the moment of inertia of any object?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Torque and Moment of Inertia of a Lever Arm
Replies
2
Views
3K
Determine Mass moment of inertia about any axis given Ixx...
Replies
4
Views
2K
Stiffened panel - moments of inertia
Replies
4
Views
2K
Experimental determination of the moment inertia of a sphere
Replies
2
Views
2K
1st, 2nd and mass moment of inertia
Replies
6
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top