Moment(torque) help (bycicle crankset)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KansaiRobot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the total force (Ftot) applied by a cyclist on a bicycle crankset using data from a sensor that measures forces (Fx, Fy, Fz) and moments (Mx, My, Mz). The user has identified that Mz and Mx are solely generated by the vertical force (F"y), which can be calculated using the formula ||F"y||= ||Mz||/(radius of crank). However, the challenge lies in deriving the horizontal forces (F"x and F"z) from the moment My, which is influenced by both. The user suspects a proportional relationship between the forces sensed at the sensor and those applied at the pedal, seeking clarification on this connection. The conversation highlights the complexities of translating sensor data into actionable force measurements in bicycle mechanics.
KansaiRobot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody.
I would appreciate your help in something I have been thinking all day (and now I am doing an allnighter, without result ):confused: (by the way, this is not "homework" since I am not at school. I have written the questions as well)

Please take a look at the attached pic. It is a bycicle crankset. Now

1) There is a sensor in the center. It can sense Fx, Fy and Fz and also Mx, My and Mz. (where F are forces and M moments (or torques))

2) The rider applies a Total force (Ftot) in the pedal. This Total Force can be decomposed as (F"x, F"y, F"z)-> just a notation.

My problem is that I have to find Ftot and the only data I have is the force and moments in the sensor.
----------------------------------

Now, I have done this so far:

1) I can see that Mz and Mx are generated ONLY by F"y. So I guess I can find F"y quite easily:

||F"y||= ||Mz||/(radius of crank)


2) I can see that My is generated by BOTH F"x and F"z.

----------------------

Now how can I get F"x and F"z from My (data)?


On related notes what is the relationship between the forces at the pedal(F"x, F"y, F"z) and the forces at the sensor? (Fx, Fy, Fz)
THIS is KEY I think!

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
Kansai
 

Attachments

  • cranckvectors.JPG
    cranckvectors.JPG
    17.9 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
If the forces involved are all in the diagrams you've shown, the forces are equal and opposite in each direction and:

(Ftot)² = (Fx)² + (Fy)² + (Fz)²
 
Thanks for the reply.

I don't know if I have been misleading with my not-so-good graphics.

The user applies a force (Ftot) over the pedal.

when I draw Fx, Fy and Fz (on the sensor) what I meant was that the sensor senses forces there. I didnt mean that there are aditional forces applied there. i don't know if I made sense, sorry.

I am thinking that somehow Fx and Fz (forces "sensed" at the sensor) are proportional to F"x and F"z(real forces applied to the pedal)

Any thoughts please?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top