Momentum and kinetic energy of pieces resulting from an explosion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of an explosion that fractures a body into two pieces of differing masses. The pieces must move in opposite directions to conserve momentum, as the total momentum before the explosion is zero. The larger object has equal momentum to the smaller one, but the smaller object moves at twice the velocity to maintain this balance. In terms of kinetic energy, the smaller object possesses twice the kinetic energy of the larger object due to its higher velocity. The explanations provided confirm the understanding of momentum and kinetic energy in this scenario.
phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A body at rest contains an explosive device which when ignited fractures the body in two pieces, one of which is two times as massive as the other.

i) Why must the pieces travel in opposite directions?

ii) How much more momentum does the larger object have, than the smalller?

iii) How much more kinetic energy does the larger object have, than the smaller?

Homework Equations



p = mv, p = momentum, m = mass and v = velocity

KE = (1/2)mv^2, KE = kinetic energy

The Attempt at a Solution



i) The pieces must travel in opposite directions due to the conversation of momentum. As the body was at rest before the explosion, and the explosion should exert roughly equal force in every direction, there is no net external force on the object and so their momentum after the explosion should add up to 0. The only way for this to happen (excluding the possibility that the objects remain at rest) is if they travel in opposite directions.

ii) As the individual momentums of the objects must equal 0, the larger object has the same amount of momentum as the smaller. This can be explained by the smaller object, which has a small mass, having a higher velocity to compensate, thereby giving the same momentum.

If p = momentum, m = mass of smaller object, v = velocity of larger object and x is an unknown, then mxv=2mv.

Rearranging this gives x = 2, therefore the smaller object will have a velocity twice that of the larger object.

iii) KE = (1/2)mv^2,

For the smaller object:

KE = (1/2)m(2v)^2 = 2mv^2

For the larger object:

KE = (1/2)2mv^2 = mv^2

Therefore the smaller object will have twice as much kinetic energy as the larger object.Have I done this correctly? I'm a bit unsure about iii)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i)correct
ii)correct
iii) and correct again !

Nice explanation by the way, i can't write that good !

PS: Are you phosgene from chemical forums?
 
Oh, thank you :)! And no, I'm not, though I do have an account there :p
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top