Momentum and Kinetic Energy Question

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision between two bodies, one with mass m and the other with mass 3m, both initially approach each other at 2 m/s. After the collision, the lighter body rebounds at 1 m/s, while the heavier body moves in the same direction at 1 m/s. The calculations for the final velocities indicate that the heavier body retains its initial direction post-collision. To determine the kinetic energy lost, one must calculate the total kinetic energy before and after the collision, noting that the energy decreases due to the inelastic nature of the collision. The discussion highlights a common confusion regarding the signs in momentum and energy equations, emphasizing the importance of careful calculations.
craig.16
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two bodies approach each other with the same speed of 2 m/s and collide head-on in an
inelastic collision. The mass of one body is m, the other has mass 3m. After the collision, the
lighter body has rebounded to travel back along its original trajectory with speed 1 m/s.
(i) What is the speed and direction of the heavier body after the collision?
(ii) How much kinetic energy was lost in the collision?
(iii) After the collision, the lighter body is brought to rest by the application of a variable
force. Calculate the work done by this force on the lighter body.

Homework Equations


m(1)u(1)+m(2)u(2)=m(1)v(1)+m(2)v(2)
KE(before) does not equal KE(after)

The Attempt at a Solution


if I take the right as the positive x direction and take the lighter mass to be traveling right therefore implying the heavier mass to be traveling left as its a head on collision I get:
2m+3m(-2)=m(-1)+3mv
2m-6m=-m+3mv
-3m=3mv
v=-1m/s

If instead I take the heavier mass to be traveling right and the lighter mass to be traveling left I get:
3m(2)+m(-2)=3mv+m(1)
6m-2m=3mv+m
3m=3mv
v=1m/s

The problem isn't necessarily which one is right but the fact that if any of these are right then that would imply that its an elastic collision as the minus sign would be squared out from the first answer. Clearly I've done a small error somewhere like a minus sign or a plus sign within my calculation or maybe its a wrong sign in what I believe to be the equation for working out loss of kinetic energy. Any help on what I have done wrong and providing a full equation to work out loss of kinetic energy will be much appreciated just to double check I haven't got the equation wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BOTH answers are correct, and in fact state the same thing:

They both say that after the collision, the heavier object is moving in the same direction it started moving at 1m/s.

In order to find the loss of kinetic energy, try calculating the kinetic energy of each object before the collision, and after the collision. How much less energy is there after the collision than there was before the collision?
 
Is the answer for loss of kinetic energy:
6J
because if so I know what I did wrong in the kinetic energy equation.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top