Momentum, Friction, and Velocity, OH MY

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the speed of three blocks when they all move at the same velocity for the first time. The user initially applied conservation of momentum but questioned the role of kinetic friction on the third block. They clarified that momentum is not conserved due to external forces, such as friction and the impulsive tension from the string. The conversation highlights the distinction between momentum conservation and kinetic energy conservation, emphasizing that momentum conservation applies only in the absence of external forces. The user ultimately seeks confirmation on their revised approach, which incorporates the effects of the third block and acknowledges the complexities introduced by friction and impulse.
rad5229
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Scan0001.jpg


We are trying to predict the speed of all three blocks at the first instant they all have the same speed using only variables.

Homework Equations



fg = mg
fk = -μk(mg) = normal force
a = F/m
t = √(2Δx/a) derived from Δx = Vot + 1/2at^2
v = vo + at
p = mv = m(at)
p1 + p2 = pf (convserve momentum)

The Attempt at a Solution



Scan0002.jpg


This is my work and final solution of Vf at the bottom, i treated m1 and m2 as one object then used conservation of momentum to find the final velocity. it just does not seem right, i would have thought it would involve the kinetic friction of m3 somehow. i am assuming this is a perfectly inelastic "collision". But when i think about it more, i am thinking they are all 3 at the same speed the instant the impulse of the 2 moving blocks cause the 3rd block to have a momentum value, thus why i used the conservation of momentum to solve for final velocity. Can anyone guide me as to whether or not my thinking is on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All the blocks will have the same speed after the string has become taut again, and when the string becomes taut, an impulsive tension acts on the block, and so momentum will not be conserved.
 
okay i think i figured it out, or at least the answer seems a little more reasonable given that it involves block 3 now. here it is reworked with the answer at the bottom, would i still be able to use m1v1 + m2v2 = mfvf (final)? I'm sorry, we have not covered this in class yet, i read the book and am working through it on my own.

Scan0003.jpg
 
i just re-read your reply. you said momentum was not conserved? could you explain more, i thought momentum was always conserved, kinetic energy was not?
 
Momentum is only conserved when there is no external force acting, in this case, there is friction as well as an impulse (A large force acting in a small time interval) by the string on the last block.
 
if we were to assume the impulse approximation, wouldn't we just throw out the frictional force anyways since the impulse force would be much greater? i think that is how to use impulse approximation
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top