Momentum-impulse vs. rectilinear motion equations

AI Thread Summary
Using rectilinear motion equations requires a correct understanding of acceleration, which in this case is not simply gravity due to the system involving pulleys. The assumption that acceleration is gravity is incorrect because the objects are not in free fall; they are influenced by additional forces. To apply kinematics correctly, one must calculate acceleration using the sum of forces equals mass times acceleration (F=ma). The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the forces acting on the system to solve for acceleration. Understanding these principles is crucial for resolving the discrepancies between the two methods.
cipotilla
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Here we are again...We have apully system as seen on page 1 of the attachment. I tried using the rectilinear motion equations, assuming a=constant, but the book's solution used the momentum-impulse equations and got a different answer.

I don't understand why my approach is incorrect... Thanks.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing wrong with using kinematics with constant acceleration. But how did you solve for the acceleration?
 
I just assumed the acceleration was gravity...I'm guessing there's something wrong with that assumption...but I don't know what...
 
Its not gravity because its not free falling. I can't believe I made that mistake. I would have to use Sum of forces=ma and find the acceleration if i wanted to use kinematics, right?
 
The "acceleration due to gravity" applies to a freely falling object--where the only force acting is gravity. But these objects are attached to ropes and pulleys--they are not freely falling! Solve for the acceleration like in any other pulley problem.
 
cipotilla said:
Its not gravity because its not free falling. I can't believe I made that mistake. I would have to use Sum of forces=ma and find the acceleration if i wanted to use kinematics, right?
Exactly. (I knew you'd snap out of it. :smile: )
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Vertical Wall approaching Man - Impulse and Momentum Conservation
Replies
10
Views
987
Vibrations: A momentum impulse starts a mass into oscillatory motion
Replies
4
Views
2K
How Does Impulse Relate to Momentum Change in Physics Problems?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Finding value of g given a motion map
Replies
30
Views
1K
Rectilinear motion, not uniform accleration
Replies
6
Views
2K
Golf club 🏌️and ball ⛳ impulse problem
Replies
19
Views
3K
Are suvat equations valid in 2 dimensional motion for constant acceleration?
Replies
5
Views
1K
Linear Motion and Linear Momentum
Replies
31
Views
4K
Problem in understanding angular momentum of a rigid body
Replies
10
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with Mass on Hemisphere
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top