Momentum & Kinetic Energy Conservation: 1kg Block & 2kg Block Collision

AI Thread Summary
In a collision between a 1kg block at rest and a 2kg block moving at 4m/s, momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not, as the collision is perfectly inelastic. The two blocks stick together after the collision, leading to a common final velocity. When the blocks compress the spring, energy conservation applies, allowing for calculations of the spring's compression and the subsequent speed of the blocks. The discussion emphasizes that momentum conservation is a fundamental principle in collisions, while kinetic energy conservation is conditional. Overall, understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of the system.
xshezsciencex
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A 1kg block is at rest on a horizontal frictionless surface touching the end of an unstretched spring of spring constant 200N/m. Tjhe other end of the spring is fixed to a wall. A 2kg block traveling at a speed v(initial)=4m/s collides with the 1kg block, and the two blocks stick together.

I am not sure if momentum or kinetic energy is conserved in this collision, if it is please explain.
When the blocks momentarily stop, by what amount is the spring compressed?
I understand that when the spring expands it will accelerate the coupled blocks from rest so what is the speed of the blocks when they are 0.20m to the left of the spring's end?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xshezsciencex said:
I am not sure if momentum or kinetic energy is conserved in this collision, if it is please explain.

Hi xshezsciencex! :smile:

Momentum is always conserved in collisions.

Energy is never conserved unless the question says so!

In this case, the question says that the collision is perfectly inelastic (whcih is just about the opposite of conservation of energy), in that the two final velocities are the same.

So use conservation of momentum, plus vf1 = vf2.

(After the collision, when the spring is being compressed, energy is conserved, and of course momentum isn't)
 
tiny-tim said:
Energy is never conserved unless the question says so!

Perhaps putting "kinetic" at the beginning will make this phrase easier to swallow :wink:
 
Hi Borek! :smile:

"mechanical" energy, actually! :wink:
 
Good point. At least we agree that the statement was a little bit bold :-p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top