Equation for Swing Leg Angle: Supporting 25 lbs in a 180 Arch

  • Thread starter Thread starter nelsontod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Swing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum leg angle for an indoor swing designed to support a 25-pound child in a 180-degree arc. Concerns are raised about safety and stability, suggesting that bolting the swing legs to the floor could provide additional support. Alternatives like jumpers with free-standing brackets are mentioned, highlighting their safety due to rigorous product testing. Participants emphasize the importance of adhering to standard designs and dimensions for children's swings to ensure safety. Overall, the conversation stresses the need for careful planning and consideration of safety standards in swing design.
nelsontod
I need help with an equation for the angle of the legs of a swing. I am building a swing. It is only 4 feet high, it is an indoor apartment swing for my son. I would like to know what the minimum legs angle would need be to support swinging 25 pounds in a 180 (probably less) arch. And if I could get some equation for that , that would be great. Is it centrifuge momentum, rotational velocity? I got B's in physics 1 and 2.

Thank you so much! just trying to help my kid stop crying and sleep more. When i swing him with my arms in teh car seat it works miracle, but he needs the arch that seats at target and walmart don't provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:
Might something like a jumper be safer than a swing? The one I checked claims to be for children up to 28 pounds.

30831684_R1.jpg


If you do use a swing, remember that you can bolt the legs to the floor rather than depend on angles.
 

Attachments

  • 30831684_R1.jpg
    30831684_R1.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 582
yes, that is true. But i have no beam.
 
25672183e83e6d1cf5c8d00ce4dff8cf--white-interior-doors-painting-interior-doors.jpg


nelsontod said:
yes, that is true. But i have no beam.

People typically use the trim of a doorway for the beam.

Jumpers also come with free standing brackets. The reason I trust them more than a home made swing is product liability. To avoid lawsuits the manufacturer must do thorough product safety engineering and testing.

jolly_jumper_and_stand_with_musical_mat.jpg


The disadvantage is that if your son weighs 25 pounds, he will exceed 28 pounds soon.
 

Attachments

  • 25672183e83e6d1cf5c8d00ce4dff8cf--white-interior-doors-painting-interior-doors.jpg
    25672183e83e6d1cf5c8d00ce4dff8cf--white-interior-doors-painting-interior-doors.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 575
  • jolly_jumper_and_stand_with_musical_mat.jpg
    jolly_jumper_and_stand_with_musical_mat.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 717
he weighs 8 pounds now.
 
nelsontod said:
would need be to support swinging 25 pounds in a 180 (probably less) arch
What the heck are you planning for the little guy? Stick to standard designs and dimensions. Just look at the Tors R Us website or similar to see what are standard dimensions for little kid indoor swings. We can't be of much help if you are planning on something that swings 180 degrees.

https://www.google.com/search?biw=1......0...1.1.64.psy-ab..1.2.275...0.JdzR_fhFRDM

https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/9e....jpeg?odnHeight=450&odnWidth=450&odnBg=FFFFFF
9e1c1629-c7f2-439c-9ff1-7dff8cd1f9a7_1.9995f914f9ff10e10d973e120c0aefa6.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 9e1c1629-c7f2-439c-9ff1-7dff8cd1f9a7_1.9995f914f9ff10e10d973e120c0aefa6.jpg
    9e1c1629-c7f2-439c-9ff1-7dff8cd1f9a7_1.9995f914f9ff10e10d973e120c0aefa6.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 531
  • Like
Likes lekh2003
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top