Momentum of Charged Particle in EM Field Explained

AI Thread Summary
The momentum of a charged particle in a time-varying electromagnetic field is expressed as p - qA, where A represents the vector magnetic potential. This relationship can be derived using concepts from Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, as well as special relativity. The discussion highlights that the quantities Pμ and Aμ form 4-vectors, with the total energy of the particle being E' = E + qΦ. The canonical momentum P' is defined as P' = P + q/c A, distinguishing it from the mechanical momentum P. This framework provides a comprehensive understanding of how charged particles behave in electromagnetic fields.
Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Can someone demonstrate how the momentum of a charged particle in a time-varying electromagnetic field is given by

p - qA

where A is the vector magnetic potential?

I've always wondered :-)

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for that. Is there not a simpler derivation ? Surely there must be?
 
Sure, just use special relativity.

1) The quantities Pμ = (p, E/c) form a 4-vector
2) The quantities Aμ = (A, Φ) form a 4-vector
3) The total energy of the particle is E' = E + q Φ
4) E' is the 4th component of a 4-vector P'μ = (P', E')
5) It must be that P'μ = Pμ + q/c Aμ
6) Hence the other three components are P' = P + q/c A

(If you're wondering about the sign in front of q/c A, note that P' is the canonical momentum and P is the mechanical momentum.
P' = P + q/c A, but P = P' - q/c A.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top