Momentum space particle in a box

tomothy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am trying to formulate a solution to the particle in a box energy eigenvalue problem, without solving a differential equation, instead using eigenvectors of p^2. My idea is to do this. Within the box (let's say it is defined between [-a,a] and within this region the hamiltonian is H={p^2}/{2m} so the solution is |\psi\rangle=c_+|p\rangle + c_- |-p\rangle. This approach is really the free particle, but I cannot work out how to adjust the potential for the momentum representation. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the solutions to the free particle are e^{ipx}, so look for linear combinations of those such that they match the boundary conditions. If you are talking about a perfect box, then look for linear combinations such that the edges go to 0.
 
Fourier transform of the potential? It would be an oscillating and nasty thing. Also the boundary condition in the momentum space would be difficult to concider. Also remember that the momentum is not an eigenvalue for the bound problem (i.e., momentum and posistion are both uncertain).
The momentum operator is not hermitean either (->no real eigenvalues).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top