A Moon Landing Q&A: Solar Winds & Astronauts

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Moon landing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on concerns about the safety of astronauts in space regarding solar winds and the effects of the Van Allen belts. Participants highlight that astronauts have successfully traveled to the Moon and returned, indicating that protective measures are in place. The Earth's magnetic field does provide some shielding, but it is limited beyond low Earth orbit. Questions about the impact of solar winds and particle exposure are raised, emphasizing the need for accurate scientific inquiry. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of understanding space travel safety and the existing protections for astronauts.
Gaz
Messages
74
Reaction score
4
I have a question about the moon landing . Wouldn't the solar winds kill any astronaut in space?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm no expert, but I think that even in space they are protected by Earth's magnetic field to some extent. But they do get pelted with various particles (mostly electrons, protons, and alpha particles). For example, I remember reading that an astronaut will see periodic flashes of light when a particle strikes her optic nerve!

I imagine that the walls of the spaceship would also offer some protection.
 
Gaz said:
I have a question about the moon landing . Wouldn't the solar winds kill any astronaut in space?
Uh ... do you not believe that we have put astronauts in space (and landed some on the moon) and brought them home safely? If you DO believe that has happened, then your question should not be "would this not happen?" but rather "clearly this doesn't happen, but how can it not?".

This may sound like silly semantics to you but my point is that in any kind of scientific inquiry, it is important to phrase questions properly lest you build in a bias towards a particular answer.
 
My question is simply a what about question. I neither believe nor dis-believe the moon landings I would like to believe there true but I ask because I am having a hard time believing the Van Allen belts would be much of a problem to a astronaut being that the particles in the belt would already be caught and slowed by the Earth's magnetic field where as the solar wind would be like the Van Allen belt on steroids or a solar system size particle accelerator. It seams to me the solar winds should be the main problem for astronauts so any info or thoughts about this is awsome =)

Geofleur I heard they get that to just in low Earth orbit nether mind father out. I don't think our magnetic field covers us for a trip to the moon though.
 
Gaz said:
I neither believe nor dis-believe the moon landings

You're off to a bad start here already. I don't know how old you are, but I'm old enough to have watched the Moon landings on television. Yes, they happened.

As for your OP question, as the PF rules will tell you, you should try Googling before asking a question to see if the answer is easily available already. Please do so. (You might also want to check your assumptions about the Van Allen belts not being an issue and about the extent of the Earth's magnetic field.) If, after you've done that, you have a more specific question, please open a new thread on that specific question. Thread closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy, berkeman and axmls
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Back
Top