Moonlander new video (very funny)

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoncaloB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Funny Video
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the monumental achievement of the 1969 moon landing, emphasizing the awe it inspired at the time. It contrasts the moon lander, once viewed as a technological marvel, with modern devices like a Furby, illustrating the rapid advancement in technology. Participants reflect on the surprising and sometimes frightening potential of current technological progress, questioning the limits of innovation. National Geographic's exploration into these themes underscores the extensive engineering and design efforts behind the moon lander, which far exceeded its computing capabilities. This conversation ultimately showcases the remarkable evolution of technology and its implications for the future.
GoncaloB
Messages
1
Reaction score
0


In 1969 when Armstrong first landed on the moon, it was the biggest event of our time. It left everyone watching in awe. The moon lander, a machine that looked like a miracle in technology at the time, is nowadays the technical equivalent of something so small and insignificant as a Furby toy.
Technological progress is so accelerated that even the humans that are behind the technology are surprised by its power and potential. We ask the question "how far can we really go?" The conclusions we reach may surprise and even scare us. National Geographic goes deep into scientific research to find answers for these questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
GoncaloB said:


In 1969 when Armstrong first landed on the moon, it was the biggest event of our time. It left everyone watching in awe. The moon lander, a machine that looked like a miracle in technology at the time, is nowadays the technical equivalent of something so small and insignificant as a Furby toy...
This reflects an obsession w/ advances in computing power. The sum of lander engineering was much, much more than its computing
capability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mheslep said:
The sum of lander engineering was much, much more than its computing capability.
That has to be the understatement of the year. The lander alone represents millions of hours of engineering, design, construction, and testing. The fact that it even could be run on that little computer power is a testament to the engineering prowess of those who designed it.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
66K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top