More alkyl groups you're attached to means you are more energetically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kurokari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Means
AI Thread Summary
In alkenes, the stability of carbocations is directly related to their reactivity, with tertiary carbocations being the most stable due to the presence of more alkyl groups. This stability allows tertiary carbocations to form more readily during reactions, which is crucial because the formation of the intermediate ion is often the rate-limiting step in a reaction. The confusion arises from the idea that increased stability leads to increased reactivity; however, it is not the carbocation itself that reacts faster, but rather that a more stable carbocation forms more quickly, facilitating the overall reaction process. Understanding this relationship highlights the importance of intermediate ion stability in governing activation energy and reaction kinetics.
Kurokari
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
In alkenes, the more alkyl groups you're attached to means you are more energetically stable, and that we know the reactivity increases as the stability of the intermediate carbocation increases (with tertiary the most stable)

I'm puzzled by this relationship, how is it that when it is more stable, the reactivity increases.

I suspect that it is because when a primary carbocation is less stable, it tends to revert back to its previous form, thus deterring the reaction while a tertiery carbocation is more readily formed and react with other substances.

I would appreciate it deeply if anyone who can clear my doubts :)

EDIT: There was a mention that the stability of the intermediate ions governs the activation energy for the reaction. (It would be nice to explain this line too!)
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org


Maybe you can formulate your question more clearly. First you mention stability of alkenes, then you talk of carbocations and then you are taking about some unspecified reaction.
For some basic chemical kinetics, this article in wikipedia may be a starting point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transition_state_theory
 


I'm sorry for the poorly-phrased question, give me another try at this.

An intermediate ion with tertiary carbocation is the most stable right? This is because it has the most alkyl group attached to it, thus making it stable.

There is also a mention that the more stable the intermediate ion(that is the tertiary carbocation in this case) is, the better the reactivity(means the faster it reacts). I'm confused how is it that a more stable compound can be more reactive.

Also there is a line that says that the intermediate ion governs activation energy, I feel that this line may help me understand my question better, however I fail to see any significant relationship between the activation energy and the intermediate ion.

I hope this is better.
 


I asked you to specify the reaction you have in mind. I suppose you are taking about some reaction of an alkene with an electrophilic.


Kurokari said:
An intermediate ion with tertiary carbocation is the most stable right? This is because it has the most alkyl group attached to it, thus making it stable.
Yes
There is also a mention that the more stable the intermediate ion(that is the tertiary carbocation in this case) is, the better the reactivity(means the faster it reacts). I'm confused how is it that a more stable compound can be more reactive.
The point is not that the carbocation reacts more rapidly but that it is formed more rapidly which is the step which limits the velocity of the reaction.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top