More friction-related wackiness

  • Thread starter Thread starter legking
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating forces related to a box resting on a 45-degree ramp, with specified coefficients of friction. For part (a), the largest force that can be applied upward parallel to the ramp, while keeping the box at rest, is determined to be 271.5 N, calculated using static friction and gravitational components. In part (b), the user struggles with finding the smallest perpendicular force needed to maintain rest, noting that the normal force differs from the previous case. The response emphasizes setting up equilibrium equations to solve for the applied force, highlighting the distinction between forces acting parallel and perpendicular to the ramp. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately determining the forces involved.
legking
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
*ahem*

A box with a mass of 22 kg is at rest on a ramp inclined at 45 deg to the horizontal. The coefficients of friction between the box and the ramp are \mu_S = 0.78 and \mu_K = 0.65.

a) Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward, parallel to the ramp, if the box is to remain at rest.

b) Determine the magnitude of the smallest force that can be applied onto the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, if the box is to remain at rest.

Answers:

a) K, I have a FBD with an applied force acting upwards parallel to the ramp, static friction acting in the opposite direction, gravity acting directly downwards, and normal force acting away from, and perpendicular to, the ramp.

I have also designated the directions upwards both parallel to and perpendicular to the ramp as positive.

If the box is to remain at rest, the applied force must equal the friction and the portion of the gravity acting against the ramp, or Fa = Ff + Fgr.

(I also noticed that, at an angle of 45 deg, the vectors for Fg, Fn and Fgr form an isoscles triangle, making Fn equal to Fgr.)

So,

Fa = Ff + Fgr
Fa = (mu)S * mg cos 45 + mg sin 45
Fa = (0.78)(22)(9.8) cos 45 + (22)(9.8) sin 45
Fa = 118.95 +152.5
Fa = 271.5 N

b) So this is where I get a little lost. My FBD has applied force into the box perpendicular to the ramp, both static friction and the normal force acting in the opposite direction, and gravity acting downwards. I just don't know what to do to develop an equation that doesn't look exactly like the one I developed in a). Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
legking said:
a) K, I have a FBD with an applied force acting upwards parallel to the ramp, static friction acting in the opposite direction, gravity acting directly downwards, and normal force acting away from, and perpendicular to, the ramp.

I have also designated the directions upwards both parallel to and perpendicular to the ramp as positive.

If the box is to remain at rest, the applied force must equal the friction and the portion of the gravity acting against the ramp, or Fa = Ff + Fgr.

(I also noticed that, at an angle of 45 deg, the vectors for Fg, Fn and Fgr form an isoscles triangle, making Fn equal to Fgr.)

So,

Fa = Ff + Fgr
Fa = (mu)S * mg cos 45 + mg sin 45
Fa = (0.78)(22)(9.8) cos 45 + (22)(9.8) sin 45
Fa = 118.95 +152.5
Fa = 271.5 N
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your method is correct.

b) So this is where I get a little lost. My FBD has applied force into the box perpendicular to the ramp, both static friction and the normal force acting in the opposite direction, and gravity acting downwards. I just don't know what to do to develop an equation that doesn't look exactly like the one I developed in a).
There are several things different here:
(1) there are only two forces parallel to the ramp (the applied force is perpendicular to the ramp)
(2) the normal force is no longer simply mg cos 45.

Set up your equilibrium equation and solve for the applied force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top