Solving Complex Math Problems: Deceleration, Acceleration, & Earthquakes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving complex math problems related to deceleration, acceleration, and earthquake wave propagation. For the train problem, the user has successfully calculated the time to stop but seeks clarification on the total time lost due to the stop. In the truck deceleration scenario, the user initially miscalculated the final speed and elapsed time, prompting a suggestion to convert units and apply the correct kinematic equations. The earthquake wave problem involves understanding the relationship between the arrival times of transverse and longitudinal waves to determine the distance from the earthquake center to the seismograph. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and unit conversions in solving these physics problems.
BriannaUND
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i don't know why I'm having so many problems but I greatly appreciate the help!
1) A train normally travels at a uniform speed of 72 km/hr on a long stretch of straight, level track. On a particular day, the train must make a 2.0-min stop at a station along this track. If the train decelerates at a uniform rate of 1.0m/s2 and, after the stop, accelerates at a rate of .5 m/s2, how much time is lost because of stopping at the station?
So far I have calculated vo= 72 km/hr (.278 m/s divided by 1 km/hr) = 20.0 m/s. Then t= v-vo/a = 0-20 m/s divided by -1.0 m/s2 = 20 sec to stop. Does this look correct? And how do I go about calculating the time lost?
2)The driver of a pickup truck going 100 km/hr applies the brakes, giving the truck a uniform deceleration of 6.5 m/s2 while it travels 20.0 m. a) what is the speed of the truck in km/hr at the end of this distance? and b) how much time has elapsed?
3) An earthquake releases two types of traveling waves, called transverse and longitudinal. The average speeds of transverse and longitudinal seismic waves in rock are 8.9 km/s and 5.1 km/s respectively. A seismograph records the arrival of the transverse waves 73 s before that of the longitudinal waves. Assuming that the waves travel in straight lines, how far away is the center of the earthquake from the seismograph?
Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't seem to have put much effort into this.

So far, 1) is perfect. Think, and keep going.

2) & 3) Yeah, so what are your thoughts on how to tackle these problems?


P.S. Please post further threads in the homework section: https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
As for
#2a) I've calculated v2 = 100 km/hr + 2 (-6.5 m/s2)(20 m), v2 = 360, v= 18.9, 100-18.9 = 81.1 km/hr
#2b) vx= vox + axt making 81.1 = 100 + (-6.5)t making t= 2.9 sec
#3) I've tried calculating average velocity and then plugging that answer in for x= average velocity x time for both of the waves. But I'm getting confused because the problem states that the arrival of the t-waves "73 sec before l-waves" so I'm not sure what to plug in for t when calculating the distance of the l-waves
 
#2a is wrong. So #2b is also wrong. You are on the right track but your calculation is wrong.
v_f ^ 2 = v_i ^ 2 + 2ad. You should also convert the 100 km / h to m / s.
-------
The transverse waves is faster than the longitudinal waves, therefore the transverse waves will reach the seismograph before the longitudinal waves (73 sec before the l-waves).
The two types of waves are released at the same time. If it takes the t-waves t (seconds) to reach the seismograph, then it takes the l-waves t + 73 seconds to reach the seismograph. So you have the time each kind of waves need to reach the seismograph. To reach the seismograph, they travels the same distance. So:
v_l (t + 73) = v_t t
You know the v_l : speed of l-waves, v_t : speed of t-waves. You can find the amount of time (t) it takes the t-waves to reach the seismograph. From there, you can easily find the distance from the seismograph to the center of the earthquake.
Viet Dao,
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top