Most accurate equation of state

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the most accurate equation of state in physical chemistry, particularly one that maintains accuracy across a wide range of pressures and temperatures while using minimal parameters. The van der Waals equation, especially when applied with Maxwell construction, is highlighted as a leading candidate, though it has limitations near critical points and in the liquid phase. Participants note that no purely theoretical equation significantly surpasses the van der Waals equation in accuracy. Instead, practical applications often rely on empirically fitted curves, which can better capture molecular complexities without overcomplicating the model. The conversation also acknowledges the existence of different equations of state for solids, which vary based on material type, and mentions advanced methods like Green's function techniques for deriving equations of state. Overall, the consensus is that while the van der Waals equation is a foundational model, it is not without its shortcomings, particularly in specific phases and conditions.
hawkingfan
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I've come across many equations of state in physical chemistry. (only a fraction of those that actually exist) Does anybody have any idea of the most accurate one to date. By accurate, I mean that it is accurate for the largest ranges of pressure and temperature by taking into account the least amount of parameters. Right now, the most accurate one that I can think of is the van der Waals equation when using a Maxwell construction. (as long as it isn't too close to the critical point) Are there any better ones as of 2010.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Almost a week and no answers. I guess that nobody knows the exact answer. I'll rephrase this. What's the most accurate equation of state that you know of? It does not have to be the most accurate one out there. Please give a pressure and temperature range at which it's applicable. Thanks for your answers if you have any.
 
As far as I know, there's no equation of state derived from pure theory that's significantly more accurate than the van der Waals one.

Basically, there wouldn't be much point in attempting to develop such an equation. You could introduce more parameters to better describe molecular geometry, the various intermolecular potentials, dipole moment, polarizability, etc. But the end result would be an equation that would be both more complicated and less accurate than what you'd get from just empirically fitting some curve using the same number of parameters.

So from the practical/engineering standpoint, that's what they use, various fitted curves. From the theoretical standpoint, we're more interested in studying the details behind phase changes and how the (non-idealized) bulk properties emerge from to the microscopic ones (something which is still not well known, even for stuff like water). Nobody's looking for a simple general "formula", because we know there's not going to be one.
 
The van der Waals equation is an equation of state which describes only liquids and gasses and does already a rather bad job in the liquid phase. For solids there are completely different equations of state, which also depend on whether you want to describe an insulator, a semiconductor or a metal. There are both highly sofisticated ab initio methods to derive equations of state, e.g. Greensfunction methods and more empirical engineering approaches. The van der Waals equation also describes very badly the region around the critical point and special techniques for this region have been developed in the 1970's.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top