What is the total energy and velocity of a ball in a vertical circular path?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total energy and velocity of a ball in a vertical circular path. The total energy is determined to be 13.6 J, combining kinetic energy (3.6 J) and potential energy (10 J) at the top of the circle. There is clarification on calculating potential energy, emphasizing that it should account for the height from the ground. The velocity at the bottom of the circle is calculated to be 5 m/s, which is higher than the 3 m/s at the top due to the influence of gravity. The calculations and concepts regarding energy conservation in the system are confirmed to be correct.
HumorMe81
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A 0.8 kg ball is whirled on a string r = 0.4 meters long in a vertical circular path. At the bottom of the circle, the ball is h = 0.45 meters from the ground. At the top of the circle, the ball has a speed of 3 m/s. Assume that the total energy of the ball is kept constant.

a. Calculate total energy of the ball (ground is zero potential energy)
I chose the top most point of the circle to do ths since PE is maximum there.
ME = KE + PE
Ke = mv^2/2 = (.8kg)*(3m/s)^2/2 = 3.6 J
PE = mgh = (.8kg)*(10m/s^2)*(1.25m) =10 J
Total energy = 13.6 J

Im not sure if i calculated the PE correctly. I know that PE at the top of the circle is mg2r but then i have to consider the height from the ground to the top of the circle. So i figured i should add the distance from the ground up and multiply by mg. is that right?

Next part of the question asks me to calculate velocity at the bottom of the circle. Here KE is larger than PE.
ME = KE + PE
13.6 J = mv^2/2 + mgh
13.6 J = (.8kg * v^2)/2 + (.8kg)*(10m/s^2)*(.45m)
When i solve for velocity i get 5m/s. how can this be? Shouldn't it be 3m/s as it is on the top? What am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything is correct. Gravity pulls down on the ball, so it speeds up going down, and slows down going up. That's why it's going 3m/s at the top and 5m/s at the bottom.

And yes, you compute potential energy correctly for both cases, because problem explicitly states that 0 is to be taken at ground level. So the height of the ball is h at the bottom and h+2r at the top. That gives you mgh and mg(h+2r) respectively for potential energy.
 
Ok, thanks a lot for your help!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top