Motion in one demansion, photogate timer problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter machinarium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Timer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two photogates used to measure the free-fall acceleration of a marble. The key equation derived is g_exp = 2Δy/(Δt)², where Δy is the distance between the gates and Δt is the time taken for the marble to pass through both gates. Participants clarify that Δt represents the time interval for the marble's descent, and they emphasize the need to adjust calculations when the upper gate is lowered, as this affects the initial velocity of the marble. The conversation also confirms that the initial conditions and equations used are correct for solving the problem. Overall, the participants provide insights into the methodology for determining g_exp under different conditions.
machinarium
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Please help me quick everyone, thank you in advance.

Homework Statement


http://imgkk.com/i/EasJ1d.jpg
a/We have two photogates placed as in the figure. We drop a marble through these at a negligble distance above the upper gate. The upper starts a timer as the ball passes through its beam and the second stop the timer.
Prove that the experimental magnitude of freefall acceleration is given by
g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2
b/ For the setup and assume that gexp =9.81m/s2, what value of \Delta{t} would you expect to measure.
c/This time, the upper photogate is placed 0.50cm lower than the first time. But we still drop the marble from the same height as the first time.
What value of gexp at this time will you determine?

Homework Equations

a = \frac{{\Delta v}}{{\Delta t}} = \frac{{{v_2} - {v_1}}}{{{t_2} - {t_1}}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Based on the problem, I think that \delta{t} is the time when the marble passes through between two gates. But if it were, I couldn't get g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2.
If it were not, I could do like that
We have {g_{\exp }} = \frac{{\Delta v}}{{\Delta t}}
Because v0=0,
Hence,
g_{exp}=2\Delta{y}/{(\Delta{t}})^2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a, the g_{exp} is your free fall acceleration.

In order to prove it, start with these equations:
a=\frac{v_{2}-v_{1}}{t_{2}-t_{1}}
as you have already written. But, also use this:
v_{avg}=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}
and rewrite it like this:
\frac{v_{1}+v_{2}}{2}=\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}

In the second equation the Vavg is just the normal equation for "average" velocity, so you can rewrite it as the third equation, simply adding the two velocities (final and initial) and dividing by two (averaging them).

So use the first and third equations, to solve for "a", but remember in this case "a" IS g_exp. A little algebra is required, you can eliminate v1 because it starts from rest (v1=0).

Also you are correct, delta(t) is the time it takes to pass through the two gates. But I don't see why you say you couldn't solve for delta(t) from this:
g_{exp}=2\Delta y/(\Delta t)^{2}
Because the only unknown in that equation is delta(t) which is what you want. The problem gives you g_exp, and delta(y) is just the distance between the two gates.

For c, you will have to redetermine the equation for g_exp because you will now have an initial velocity. Originally the ball was assumed to have an initial velocity of zero, but now that the top gate is lower, the ball will obtain some downward motion by the time it reaches the upper gate.
 
Thank you too much Oddbio.
And I want too say more clearly about part c. That is the upper gate is placed accidentaly lower than before. So the problem ask us to calculate in that accident.
(This is problem 113, chapter 2 - Motion in one dimension - Physics for Scientist and Engineers 6th edtion - Tipler Mosca - Univer of Washington)
Here is my solution, is this correct, is there something need to be corrected?
http://imgkk.com/i/5Be70O.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes they all look correct to me. Good job :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top