Motion of a mass m confined to the x-axis (Hamiltonian)

jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Consider a mass m confined to the x-axis and subject to a force Fx=kx where k>0.

Write down and sketch the potential energy U(x) and describe the possible motions of the mass. (Distinguish between the cases that E>0 and E<0.


It is the part in parenthesis that confuses me. I can't picture what a negative value of energy would be.

I know the potential is U(x) = (1/2)kx2, and that Total energy is kinetic plus potential (E = T + U). I also assume that the potential is always positive. If this is true, then the only was for the energy to be negative is to have the kinetic be negative and larger than the potential.

Does this refer to the case when the mass is moving in the -x direction giving T = -(1/2)mv2?

It seems to me that the motion should be the same whether the energy is negative or positive since this is a classical mass and confined to the parabolic potential well. It seems like it should oscillate back and forth for any energy.

For some reason I don't think I am picturing this correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've written down the potential for the force F = -kx, but your force doesn't have the negative sign. The potential should be U(x) = -1/2 kx2. Now E<0 should make sense to you.
 
The problem specifically states that k > 0, and F = kx, which gives U = 1/2 kx^2. I don't really understand what you are trying to say, or where the F = -kx that you wrote comes from.
 
I'm saying your belief that F=kx implies U = 1/2 kx2 is wrong. Look up how to find the potential from a force or vice versa.
 
Ah, okay, I understand now. I forgot that the potential is opposite the sign of force! Thank you!

F = -dU/dx
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top