Motion of a point is equal to dynamic harmonic oscilation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the motion of a point mass along the x-axis, described by the velocity equation v = (A - Bx^2)^(1/2), represents dynamic harmonic oscillation. Participants explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, noting that energy conservation principles can be applied. By integrating the derived equations, they establish connections between the variables and identify constants A and B in terms of energy parameters. The conclusion suggests that the equation can be reformulated to match the standard form of simple harmonic motion, leading to the identification of the angular frequency ω. Ultimately, the participants aim to find the period (T) of the oscillation based on these relationships.
prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Point with mass is moving along the positive direction of x axis, its velocity is described by (A-Bx^2)^(1/2). Show that its equation of motion describes dynamic harmonic oscillation and find period (T) of this oscillation.

Homework Equations


v=(A-Bx^2)^(1/2)
A and B is known constants

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Hi, guys!
My first instinct is to try to get something from F=m*a=-k*x.
Further more m*(dv/dt)=-k*x, but immediately i see that its wrong because v=v(x) not v(t).

So ,please, could someone give me some advice.
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint short:

If energy is conserved for a SHO along the lines of
$$ stuff1 \times v^2 + stuff2 \times x^2 = constant$$
no?

Hint, long:

$$ F = m {dv \over dt} = m {dv \over dx} {dx \over dt} = m v {dv \over dx} = -kx$$

Integrate dx both sides, what do you get?
 
hello!
Thank you for your hints, I had forgotten connections between derivatives.

If I take the equation mv (dv/dx)=-kx
I obtain m*v*dv=-k*x*dx
By integrating m *(v^2)/2+C1=-k*(x^2)/2+C2
I suppose I could now substitute v with given equation but if I do so, the equation becomes very messy and I do not think that it could be reduced to something useful.

What do you suggest?
 
Does your equation with the squares look like a conservation equation to you? :D (protip, you could haved used conservation of energy, but instead you derived it like a beast!)

Anyways, if you solve for v from x from that equation, what do you get? What is the equivalent of
$$\omega = \sqrt{k \over m}$$ when you try to match your equation to the given equation $$v = (A-Bx^2)^{1 \over 2}$$
 
Last edited:
prehisto said:
Show that its equation of motion describes dynamic harmonic oscillation and find period (T) of this oscillation.
There is a simpler alternative to showing it satisfies the usual SHM ODE: show it satisfies the solution to an SHM ODE.
 
paralleltransport said:
Does your equation with the squares look like a conservation equation to you? :D (protip, you could haved used conservation of energy, but instead you derived it like a beast!)

Anyways, if you solve for v from x from that equation, what do you get? What is the equivalent of
$$\omega = \sqrt{k \over m}$$ when you try to match your equation to the given equation $$v = (A-Bx^2)^{1 \over 2}$$

If I solve for v, I obtain v = ({\frac{\ 2(C1-C2)}{m}} - {\frac{\ k x^2}{m}})^{(1/2)}
which looks similar to given equation and if I assume that
A≡{\frac{\ 2(C1-C2)}{m}}
it can be rewritten
v = (A - ω^2x^2)^{(1/2)}
which means that
B≡ ω^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top