Motion of celestial objects in Spacetime looks circular in 3D how?

AI Thread Summary
The motion of celestial objects appears circular in 3D due to the curvature of spacetime around massive objects, rather than being truly circular. In this context, the term "geodesic" is more appropriate than "straight line," as it describes the path that minimizes distance in curved spacetime. Unlike Euclidean geometry, where a straight line between two points is unique, curved spacetime allows for multiple geodesics. This distinction is crucial for understanding how objects move in a four-dimensional framework. Ultimately, the perception of circular motion arises from the interplay between our three-dimensional observations and the underlying four-dimensional reality.
VaibhavP
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am confused, how the motion of the planets we observing is circular?
The motion of the every object in Spacetime is straight, but as we are watching it in 3D, it seems to be circular. What is the reason behind it?
In simple words, how the straight motion of the objects in 4D(spacetime) looks circular in the 3D??
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are taking the term "straight" too literally, and you are thinking of spacetime as if it were Euclidean. Don't let your Euclidean concept of space straight-jacket your thinking! Spacetime in the vicinity of a massive object is not Euclidean.

A much better term to use than "straight line" is "geodesic". A geodesic generalizes the concept of straightness. Don't think of it as meaning "straight" in the Euclidean sense. In Euclidean geometry, the straight line from point A to point B is the path that minimizes the length of the path per the Euclidean norm. In curved spacetime, a geodesic from point A to point B is a path that minimizes the length of the path per the Riemannian metric tensor.

Note that I said "the straight line" but "a geodesic". There is but one "straight line" from A to B in Euclidean geometry. It is unique. This is no longer true in curved spacetime.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top