Motion of mass connected to a spring at constant velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the motion of a mass attached to a spring moving at a constant velocity. The position of the spring is defined by X = l + vt, where l is the spring's equilibrium length. The force exerted by the spring is described by F_s = -kd, with d representing the displacement from equilibrium. Participants highlight the need for a free body diagram to analyze the forces acting on the spring and the mass, noting that the problem leads to a second-order non-homogeneous linear differential equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining variables and understanding the dynamics of the mass-spring system.
Holmez2_718
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a mass m at x = 0 attached to a spring with spring constant k which is moving at constant velocity v such that the position of the spring is described by X = l + vt where l is the equilibrium length of the spring. Solve for the motion of the mass.

Homework Equations


We have F_s = -kd where d is the displacement from equilibrium, and F = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}.

The Attempt at a Solution


d = X - x - l = vt - x, so F = F_s = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = k(d-vt). Trouble is, I don't think the differential equation is separable and don't know how to deal with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to find x(t) for the mass ... where the X(t) is the bulk motion of the spring?

Which part of the spring? Is it the part of the spring that would normally be attached to a wall or the center of mass of the spring or what?
It looks like you will need to draw a free body diagram for that bit of the spring: in order to move at constant velocity, it must be acted on by a varying force... but that may not be a problem.

I take it the surface is without friction and the initial extension of the spring is not zero?
I see that the spring is moving to the right (X increases with time) ... Is the mass to the right or to the left?

[edit] looking at the description you gave me, it looks like you start with a mass+spring setup at rest, and the end of the spring not attached to the mass is pulled away from the mass at a constant velocity.
 
Anyway - that's a second order non-homogenious linear equation with... constant coefficients right?
You'll know techniques for dealing with them.

BTW: You don't want a "d" in your equation though, it will vary with time: you want only x, t, and constants in there.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top