Motion & Relative Dynamics Question

AI Thread Summary
To solve the projectile motion problem, the initial conditions include a launch speed of 20 m/s at a 30° angle from a 30 m high building. The time to reach the ground can be calculated using kinematic equations, assuming no air resistance. For part (b), the horizontal and vertical components of the velocity are determined, and trigonometry is used to find the resultant velocity's magnitude and direction upon impact. Higher mathematics may enhance understanding and simplify the problem-solving process. This approach effectively guides the student through the concepts of motion and relative dynamics.
BIGEYE
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
My son is just starting his advanced highers physics and asks on how best to approach/solve this problem:

A projectile is launched from the top of a building with an initial speed of 20 m s-1 at an angle of 30° to the horizontal. The height of the building is 30 m.
(a) Calculate how long it takes the projectile to reach the ground.
(b) Calculate the velocity of the projectile on impact with the ground, (magnitude and direction).

Appreciate any help.

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is found by simple constant acceleration kinematic equations (equations of motion). You also allply assumptions, such as no losses due to air resistance etc.

You use the inital conditions to find the time taken to hit the ground from one of the suitable equations.

From this you can find all the other information.

For part b you find the horizontal and vertical components of the velocities (from the equations above). You then use these vectors to build a triagle, and use trigonometry to work out the combined magnitude and angle from horizontal.
 
Thanks, that's got him thinking. To find the time it takes to hit the ground, he will first need to find the height the projectile gets to.
 
I do not know what you meant by higher physics. However, for your son's best, you need to ask him to try higher mathmatics. It's nearly an one-step question if your son knows how to use higher mathmatics. Trust me, that's the best for your son.

\vec{g} = -9.81j, \vec{h}_{0} = 30j, v_{0} = 20, \theta_{0} = 30^o, \vec{v}_{0} = v_{0}cos\theta_{0}i + v_{0}sin\theta_{0}j

\vec{v} = \int\vec{g}dt = \vec{v}_{0} + \vec{g}t

\vec{r} = \int\vec{v}dt = \vec{h}_{0} + \vec{v}_{0}t + \frac{1}{2}\vec{g}t^2
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top