Movable mirror of a Michelson interferometer

AI Thread Summary
To determine how far the movable mirror of a Michelson interferometer must be displaced for 2000 fringes to pass the reference point, one must consider the wavelength of the light source, which is 589 nm. Each fringe corresponds to a path length difference of one wavelength, so for 2000 fringes, the total path length difference is 2000 wavelengths. This results in a displacement of the movable mirror of 1000 wavelengths, or 1000 times 589 nm, which equals 589,000 nm or 589 micrometers. The discussion also briefly touches on a Sagnac interferometer question, but the primary focus remains on the Michelson interferometer calculation. Understanding the relationship between fringe movement and wavelength is crucial for solving this problem.
oaly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i know the question may be a bit stupid to some people, but i seriously don't know how to do it...

Homework Statement


How far must the movable mirror of a Michelson interferometer, illuminated by a 589-nm source, be displaces for 2000 fringes to move past the reference point?


Homework Equations



i have no idea

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't know how to solve it
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What's the path length difference associated with 2000 fringes?
 


ideasrule said:
What's the path length difference associated with 2000 fringes?

it does not say, that was the whole question.
 


Yes, but it does tell you the wavelength, and constructive interference occurs when the path length difference is an integer multiple of the wavelength.
 


can anyone answer this question
In Sagnac interferometer replace the beam splitter by a fourth mirror and calculate how many loops around the interferometer can the light make before its intensity is reduced by 99%??
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving for Mirror Displacement in a Michelson Interferometer
Replies
1
Views
2K
Transmission and reflectivity in a Michelson interferometer.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Michelson interferometer moves and bright fringes disappear
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Does a Michelson Interferometer Measure Distances?
Replies
6
Views
3K
Calculating the Period of Fringe Pattern for Michelson Interferometer
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fringe Visibility of Sodium Doublet in Michelson interferometer
Replies
8
Views
5K
Interferometer Considerations: Arm Lengths and Vibration Noise
Replies
2
Views
2K
Michelson Interferometer (Zero Path Difference)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Haidinger fringe (interferometer at zero path difference)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Michelson Interferometer IR Lab Question
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top