Running 3 Miles: The Staggering Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Namloh2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames
AI Thread Summary
Running 3 miles raises questions about motion and infinity, particularly through Zeno's Paradox, which suggests that one must reach an infinite number of halfway points. Despite this paradox, individuals can complete the distance because the sum of an infinite series, like the distances covered in each segment, remains finite. Each segment takes progressively less time, allowing for a finite completion of the run. The discussion highlights the tension between mathematical theory and practical experience in motion. Understanding these concepts can lead to deeper insights into the nature of distance and time.
Namloh2000
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Moving in Frames??

okay, so let's say I ran 3 miles. At one point, I must have been halfway between start and finish right? From the halfway point, I must have existed halfway from there and the remaining 1.5 miles also. And halfway between THAT point and the finish. Then halfway from THAT point and the finish. I must have existed at all these halfway points, but if motion was fluid, couldn't this not be accomplished, being that I can divide my new remaining distance in half from here to infinity, meaning that I would have to be running forever? The implications are staggering!

seriously though, what's up - how come I can run 3 miles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is known as Zeno's Paradox. The sum of an infinite series is still finite. Google it. Much has been said about it.
 
okay so i read up a bit and the solution seems to be something in that because the sum of the series ½ + ¼ + 1/8 + ... is equal to 1. The total time is finite because each step is done in half as much time as the previous step.

But I still don't understand.
 
OK, I see that you don't have much faith in mathematics. Anyway, go visit here if you are interested: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=22419

You can open a new thread in the General Math section if you still don't believe in Zeno's Paradox. You will get more replies there, and most of them will be harsh. So good luck! :)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top